» Articles » PMID: 1853941

Enamel Structure and Microwear: an Experimental Study of the Response of Enamel to Shearing Force

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 1991 May 1
PMID 1853941
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The anisotropic fracturing and differential wear properties of enamel microstructure represent factors that can obscure the predictive relationship between dental microwear and diet. To assess the impact of enamel structure on microwear, this in vitro experimental study examines the relative contributions to wear of three factors: 1) species differences in microstructure, 2) direction of shearing force relative to enamel prisms and crystallites, and 3) size of abrasive particles. Teeth of Lemur, Ovis, Homo, and Crocodylus, representing, respectively, the structural categories of prismatic patterns 1, 2, and 3 and nonprismatic enamel, were abraded by shearing forces (forces having a component directed parallel to abraded surfaces) and examined by scanning electron microscopy. Striation width increased with particle size for nonprismatic, but not for prismatic, specimens. Direction of shear relative to prism and crystallite orientation had a significant influence on striation width in only some prismatic enamels. The different responses of prismatic and nonprismatic enamels to abrasion reflect the influence of structure, but at the level of organization of crystallites rather than prisms per se. Such interactions explain in part the inability of striation width to discriminate among animals with different dietary habits. Heteroscedasticity and deviations from normality also may confound parametric analyses of microwear variables. Variation in crystallite orientation in prismatic enamels may contribute to optimal dental function through the property of differential wear in functionally distinct regions of teeth.

Citing Articles

Increasing control over biomineralization in conodont evolution.

Shirley B, Leonhard I, Murdock D, Repetski J, Swis P, Bestmann M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):5273.

PMID: 38902270 PMC: 11190287. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49526-0.


Fundamental mechanics of tooth fracture and wear: implications for humans and other primates.

Borrero-Lopez O, Rodriguez-Rojas F, Constantino P, Lawn B Interface Focus. 2021; 11(5):20200070.

PMID: 34938431 PMC: 8361572. DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2020.0070.


On the vital role of enamel prism interfaces and graded properties in human tooth survival.

Borrero-Lopez O, Constantino P, Bush M, Lawn B Biol Lett. 2020; 16(8):20200498.

PMID: 32842897 PMC: 7480149. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0498.


Shape, size, and quantity of ingested external abrasives influence dental microwear texture formation in guinea pigs.

Winkler D, Tutken T, Schulz-Kornas E, Kaiser T, Muller J, Leichliter J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(36):22264-22273.

PMID: 32839331 PMC: 7486718. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2008149117.


Masticatory jaw movement of Exaeretodon argentinus (Therapsida: Cynodontia) inferred from its dental microwear.

Kubo T, Yamada E, Kubo M PLoS One. 2017; 12(11):e0188023.

PMID: 29186178 PMC: 5706674. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188023.