» Articles » PMID: 18516642

3D Segmentation and Quantification of a Masticatory Muscle from MR Data Using Patient-specific Models and Matching Distributions

Overview
Journal J Digit Imaging
Publisher Springer
Date 2008 Jun 3
PMID 18516642
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A method is proposed for 3D segmentation and quantification of the masseter muscle from magnetic resonance (MR) images, which is often performed in pre-surgical planning and diagnosis. Because of a lack of suitable automatic techniques, a common practice is for clinicians to manually trace out all relevant regions from the image slices which is extremely time-consuming. The proposed method allows significant time savings. In the proposed method, a patient-specific masseter model is built from a test dataset after determining the dominant slices that represent the salient features of the 3D muscle shape from training datasets. Segmentation is carried out only on these slices in the test dataset, with shape-based interpolation then applied to build the patient-specific model, which serves as a coarse segmentation of the masseter. This is first refined by matching the intensity distribution within the masseter volume against the distribution estimated from the segmentations in the dominant slices, and further refined through boundary analysis where the homogeneity of the intensities of the boundary pixels is analyzed and outliers removed. It was observed that the left and right masseter muscles' volumes in young adults (28.54 and 27.72 cm(3)) are higher than those of older (ethnic group removed) adults (23.16 and 22.13 cm(3)). Evaluation indicates good agreement between the segmentations and manual tracings, with average overlap indexes for the left and right masseters at 86.6% and 87.5% respectively.

Citing Articles

Automatic Masseter Muscle Accurate Segmentation from CBCT Using Deep Learning-Based Model.

Jiang Y, Shang F, Peng J, Liang J, Fan Y, Yang Z J Clin Med. 2023; 12(1).

PMID: 36614860 PMC: 9820952. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12010055.


Assessment of condyle, masseter and temporal muscles volumes in patients with juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: A cross-sectional study.

Golin S, Sinicato N, Valle-Corotti K, Fuziy A, Nahas-Scocate A, Appenzeller S J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2017; 7(2):89-94.

PMID: 28706781 PMC: 5497397. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2017.05.004.


Reliable femoral frame construction based on MRI dedicated to muscles position follow-up.

Dubois G, Bonneau D, Lafage V, Rouch P, Skalli W Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015; 53(10):921-8.

PMID: 25952020 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-015-1302-y.

References
1.
Van Leemput K, Maes F, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P . Automated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000; 18(10):897-908. DOI: 10.1109/42.811270. View

2.
K Goto T, Nishida S, Yahagi M, Langenbach G, Nakamura Y, Tokumori K . Size and orientation of masticatory muscles in patients with mandibular laterognathism. J Dent Res. 2006; 85(6):552-6. DOI: 10.1177/154405910608500614. View

3.
Hu Q, Hou Z, Nowinski W . Supervised range-constrained thresholding. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2006; 15(1):228-40. DOI: 10.1109/tip.2005.860348. View

4.
K Goto T, Tokumori K, Nakamura Y, Yahagi M, Yuasa K, Okamura K . Volume changes in human masticatory muscles between jaw closing and opening. J Dent Res. 2002; 81(6):428-32. DOI: 10.1177/154405910208100614. View

5.
Noguchi N, Goto M . Computer simulation system for orthognathic surgery. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003; 6 Suppl 1:176-8. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.254.x. View