» Articles » PMID: 18511488

Health Insurance and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Older Women in Latin American and Caribbean Cities

Overview
Journal Int J Epidemiol
Specialty Public Health
Date 2008 May 31
PMID 18511488
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to describe the prevalence of Papanicolaou (Pap) smear use for cervical cancer screening and to estimate its association with type of health care insurance.

Methods: A cross-sectional study using data from the Health, Well-Being and Aging in Latin America and the Caribbean Study (SABE). The sample includes 6357 women aged 60 and older from seven cities. The outcome was reporting a Pap smear for cervical cancer screening during the previous 2 years. Main independent variable was health care insurance. Covariates were demographic or socioeconomic variables, medical conditions and functional status.

Results: Prevalence of Pap smear use across the seven cities ranged from 21% in Bridgetown to 45% in Mexico City. In a multivariate analysis of the combined sample, without Havana that has universal health care insurance, women with public insurance (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.43-0.71) or with no insurance (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15-0.34) were less likely to have a Pap smear compared with women with private insurance. Also, women with no insurance were less likely to have a Pap smear (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.30-0.54) compared with women with any health insurance.

Conclusions: In general, the prevalence of Pap smear use was lower than that reported for Hispanic populations in the United States. Overall, lack of health insurance or having public health insurance determined lower odds for having a Pap smear for cervical cancer screening.

Citing Articles

Cervical cancer screening and its associated factors among women of reproductive age in Kenya: further analysis of Kenyan demographic and health survey 2022.

Gebreegziabher Z, Semagn B, Kifelew Y, Abebaw W, Tilahun W BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):741.

PMID: 38459446 PMC: 10921781. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18148-y.


Cervical Cancer Awareness and Attitude Towards Cervical Cancer Screening and Human Papillomavirus Vaccines Among Urban Women of Karachi, Pakistan.

Shahnaz S, Fricovsky E, Anwar R, Arain M Cureus. 2023; 15(8):e42970.

PMID: 37671214 PMC: 10475580. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42970.


Determinants of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women Aged 30-49 Years Old in Four African Countries: A Cross-Sectional Secondary Data Analysis.

Alie M, Negesse Y, Ayenew M Cancer Control. 2023; 30:10732748231195681.

PMID: 37656980 PMC: 10475266. DOI: 10.1177/10732748231195681.


Cervical Cancer Screening Among Older Garifuna Women Residing in New York City.

Rockson L, Btoush R J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023; 11(3):1600-1610.

PMID: 37212964 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-023-01635-0.


Adherence to Cervical Cancer Screening Programs in Migrant Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Rosato I, Dalla Zuanna T, Tricarico V, Barbiellini Amidei C, Canova C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3).

PMID: 36767568 PMC: 9915157. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032200.


References
1.
Torres L, Werner B, Totsugui J, Collaco L, Araujo S, Huculak M . Cervical cancer screening program of Paraná: cost-effective model in a developing country. Diagn Cytopathol. 2003; 29(1):49-54. DOI: 10.1002/dc.10269. View

2.
Albala C, Lebrao M, Leon Diaz E, Ham-Chande R, Hennis A, Palloni A . [The Health, Well-Being, and Aging ("SABE") survey: methodology applied and profile of the study population]. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2005; 17(5-6):307-22. DOI: 10.1590/s1020-49892005000500003. View

3.
Watkins M, Gabali C, Winkleby M, Gaona E, Lebaron S . Barriers to cervical cancer screening in rural Mexico. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2002; 12(5):475-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2002.01170.x. View

4.
Sepulveda C, Prado R . Effective cervical cytology screening programmes in middle-income countries: the Chilean experience. Cancer Detect Prev. 2005; 29(5):405-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2005.07.001. View

5.
Mandelblatt J, Lawrence W, Gaffikin L, Limpahayom K, Lumbiganon P, Warakamin S . Costs and benefits of different strategies to screen for cervical cancer in less-developed countries. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94(19):1469-83. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/94.19.1469. View