» Articles » PMID: 18506418

QTL Analysis of Cleistogamy in Soybean

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Genetics
Date 2008 May 29
PMID 18506418
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Early-maturing cultivars of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] native to the shores of the Sea of Okhotsk (Sakhalin and Kuril Islands) and eastern Hokkaido (northern Japan) have a strong tendency to produce cleistogamous flowers throughout their blooming period. A previous study revealed that cleistogamy is controlled by a minimum of two genes with epistatic interaction, one of which is associated with a maturity gene responsible for insensitivity to incandescent long daylength (ILD). This study was conducted to determine the genetic basis of cleistogamy in more detail by QTL mapping. F2 to F4 progenies derived from a cross between a cleistogamous cv. Karafuto-1 and a chasmogamous cv. Toyosuzu were used. A molecular linkage map spanning 2,180 cM comprising 500 markers was constructed using 89 F2 plants. The markers were distributed in 25 linkage groups. An interval mapping method to analyze categorical traits identified four QTLs for cleistogamy, cl1, cl2, cl3 and cl4, in molecular linkage groups (MLGs) C2, D1a, I and L, respectively. Alleles derived from Karafuto-1 had additive effects to increase probability of cleistogamy at cl3 and cl4, whereas the alleles had additive effects to decrease the probablity at cl1 and cl2. Progeny test confirmed the effects of cl3, which had the highest LOD score (5.20). Composite interval mapping revealed four QTLs for flowering date, fd5-fd8. Judging from relative location with markers and association with ILD responses, fd7 and fd8 may correspond to maturity genes E4 and E3, respectively. cl3 and cl4 were located at similar positions as fd7 and fd8, suggesting that the two maturity genes may control cleistogamy by either pleiotropy or close linkage.

Citing Articles

A flowering time locus dependent on in soybean.

Su T, Wang Y, Li S, Wang L, Kou K, Kong L Mol Breed. 2023; 41(5):35.

PMID: 37309325 PMC: 10236059. DOI: 10.1007/s11032-021-01224-1.


Identification of novel loci for flowering time in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek] using genome-wide association study.

Seo H, Kwon H, Satyawan D, Kim M, Ha J, Lee S Genes Genomics. 2023; 45(7):911-919.

PMID: 37202555 DOI: 10.1007/s13258-023-01372-y.


Differential transpiration between pods and leaves during stress combination in soybean.

Sinha R, Shostak B, Induri S, Sen S, Zandalinas S, Joshi T Plant Physiol. 2023; 192(2):753-766.

PMID: 36810691 PMC: 10231362. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiad114.


A small chromosomal inversion mediated by MITE transposons confers cleistogamy in Brassica napus.

Wan S, Yang M, Ni F, Chen W, Wang Y, Chu P Plant Physiol. 2022; 190(3):1841-1853.

PMID: 36005931 PMC: 9614453. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiac395.


Differential regulation of flower transpiration during abiotic stress in annual plants.

Sinha R, Zandalinas S, Fichman Y, Sen S, Zeng S, Gomez-Cadenas A New Phytol. 2022; 235(2):611-629.

PMID: 35441705 PMC: 9323482. DOI: 10.1111/nph.18162.


References
1.
Kawaguchi M, Motomura T, Akao S, Kawasaki S . Providing the basis for genomics in Lotus japonicus: the accessions Miyakojima and Gifu are appropriate crossing partners for genetic analyses. Mol Genet Genomics. 2001; 266(2):157-66. DOI: 10.1007/s004380100540. View

2.
Takahashi R, Kurosaki H, Yumoto S, Han O, Abe J . Genetic and linkage analysis of cleistogamy in soybean. J Hered. 2001; 92(1):89-92. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/92.1.89. View

3.
Zeng Z . Theoretical basis for separation of multiple linked gene effects in mapping quantitative trait loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993; 90(23):10972-6. PMC: 47903. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.23.10972. View

4.
Molnar S, Rai S, Charette M, Cober E . Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers linked to E1, E3, E4, and E7 maturity genes in soybean. Genome. 2003; 46(6):1024-36. DOI: 10.1139/g03-079. View

5.
Hayashi T, Awata T . Interval mapping for loci affecting unordered categorical traits. Heredity (Edinb). 2006; 96(2):185-94. DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800783. View