» Articles » PMID: 18498103

Very Fast Prediction and Rationalization of PKa Values for Protein-ligand Complexes

Overview
Journal Proteins
Date 2008 May 24
PMID 18498103
Citations 366
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The PROPKA method for the prediction of the pK(a) values of ionizable residues in proteins is extended to include the effect of non-proteinaceous ligands on protein pK(a) values as well as predict the change in pK(a) values of ionizable groups on the ligand itself. This new version of PROPKA (PROPKA 2.0) is, as much as possible, developed by adapting the empirical rules underlying PROPKA 1.0 to ligand functional groups. Thus, the speed of PROPKA is retained, so that the pK(a) values of all ionizable groups are computed in a matter of seconds for most proteins. This adaptation is validated by comparing PROPKA 2.0 predictions to experimental data for 26 protein-ligand complexes including trypsin, thrombin, three pepsins, HIV-1 protease, chymotrypsin, xylanase, hydroxynitrile lyase, and dihydrofolate reductase. For trypsin and thrombin, large protonation state changes (|n| > 0.5) have been observed experimentally for 4 out of 14 ligand complexes. PROPKA 2.0 and Klebe's PEOE approach (Czodrowski P et al. J Mol Biol 2007;367:1347-1356) both identify three of the four large protonation state changes. The protonation state changes due to plasmepsin II, cathepsin D and endothiapepsin binding to pepstatin are predicted to within 0.4 proton units at pH 6.5 and 7.0, respectively. The PROPKA 2.0 results indicate that structural changes due to ligand binding contribute significantly to the proton uptake/release, as do residues far away from the binding site, primarily due to the change in the local environment of a particular residue and hence the change in the local hydrogen bonding network. Overall the results suggest that PROPKA 2.0 provides a good description of the protein-ligand interactions that have an important effect on the pK(a) values of titratable groups, thereby permitting fast and accurate determination of the protonation states of key residues and ligand functional groups within the binding or active site of a protein.

Citing Articles

Binding Mechanism of Inhibitors to CDK6 Deciphered by Multiple Independent Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Free Energy Predictions.

Wang L, Wang Y, Zhang L, Zhao J, Wu S, Yang Z Molecules. 2025; 30(5).

PMID: 40076203 PMC: 11901890. DOI: 10.3390/molecules30050979.


Predicting Reduction Potentials of Blue Copper Proteins Using Quantum Mechanical Calculations.

Dehabadi M, Irani M, Ryde U Inorg Chem. 2025; 64(8):3917-3929.

PMID: 39979212 PMC: 11881046. DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c05183.


CNEURO-201, an Anti-amyloidogenic Agent and σ1-Receptor Agonist, Improves Cognition in the Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease by Multiple Actions in the Pathology.

Martinez-Orozco H, Bencomo-Martinez A, Maya-Arteaga J, Rubio-De Anda P, Sanabria-Romero F, Casas Z Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(3).

PMID: 39941068 PMC: 11818425. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26031301.


Deciphering the safeguarding role of cysteine residues in p53 against HO-induced oxidation using high-resolution native mass spectrometry.

Peris-Diaz M, Krezel A, Barran P Commun Chem. 2025; 8(1):13.

PMID: 39814824 PMC: 11736120. DOI: 10.1038/s42004-024-01395-w.


The role of ribosomal protein networks in ribosome dynamics.

Timsit Y, Sergeant-Perthuis G, Bennequin D Nucleic Acids Res. 2025; 53(1.

PMID: 39788545 PMC: 11711686. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae1308.