» Articles » PMID: 18495544

Rat Disc Torsional Mechanics: Effect of Lumbar and Caudal Levels and Axial Compression Load

Overview
Journal Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2008 May 23
PMID 18495544
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background Context: Rat models with altered loading are used to study disc degeneration and mechano-transduction. Given the prominent role of mechanics in disc function and degeneration, it is critical to measure mechanical behavior to evaluate changes after model interventions. Axial compression mechanics of the rat disc are representative of the human disc when normalized by geometry, and differences between the lumbar and caudal disc have been quantified in axial compression. No study has quantified rat disc torsional mechanics.

Purpose: Compare the torsional mechanical behavior of rat lumbar and caudal discs, determine the contribution of combined axial load on torsional mechanics, and compare the torsional properties of rat discs to human lumbar discs.

Study Design: Cadaveric biomechanical study.

Methods: Cyclic torsion without compressive load followed by cyclic torsion with a fixed compressive load was applied to rat lumbar and caudal disc levels.

Results: The apparent torsional modulus was higher in the lumbar region than in the caudal region: 0.081+/-0.026 (MPa/degrees, mean+/-SD) for lumbar axially loaded; 0.066+/-0.028 for caudal axially loaded; 0.091+/-0.033 for lumbar in pure torsion; and 0.056+/-0.035 for caudal in pure torsion. These values were similar to human disc properties reported in the literature ranging from 0.024 to 0.21 MPa/degrees.

Conclusions: Use of the caudal disc as a model may be appropriate if the mechanical focus is within the linear region of the loading regime. These results provide support for use of this animal model in basic science studies with respect to torsional mechanics.

Citing Articles

Jointed tails enhance control of three-dimensional body rotation.

Fu X, Zhang B, Weber C, Cooper K, Vasudevan R, Moore T J R Soc Interface. 2025; 22(223):20240355.

PMID: 39904367 PMC: 11793978. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0355.


Jointed tails enhance control of three-dimensional body rotation.

Fu X, Zhang B, Weber C, Cooper K, Vasudevan R, Moore T ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38947937 PMC: 11213154.


Peptide-functionalized double network hydrogel with compressible shape memory effect for intervertebral disc regeneration.

Ho C, Wang C, Wu T, Kuan C, Liu Y, Wang T Bioeng Transl Med. 2023; 8(2):e10447.

PMID: 36925718 PMC: 10013763. DOI: 10.1002/btm2.10447.


A thermosensitive, reactive oxygen species-responsive, MR409-encapsulated hydrogel ameliorates disc degeneration in rats by inhibiting the secretory autophagy pathway.

Zheng Q, Shen H, Tong Z, Cheng L, Xu Y, Feng Z Theranostics. 2021; 11(1):147-163.

PMID: 33391467 PMC: 7681093. DOI: 10.7150/thno.47723.


Comparison of inbred mouse strains shows diverse phenotypic outcomes of intervertebral disc aging.

Novais E, Tran V, Miao J, Slaver K, Sinensky A, Dyment N Aging Cell. 2020; 19(5):e13148.

PMID: 32319726 PMC: 7253061. DOI: 10.1111/acel.13148.


References
1.
Zimmerman M, Parsons J, CARTER F, Gutteling E, Lee C, Langrana N . The mechanical properties of the canine lumbar disc and motion segment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992; 17(2):213-20. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199202000-00016. View

2.
Haughton V, Lim T, An H . Intervertebral disk appearance correlated with stiffness of lumbar spinal motion segments. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999; 20(6):1161-5. PMC: 7056248. View

3.
Elliott D, Yerramalli C, Beckstein J, Boxberger J, Johannessen W, Vresilovic E . The effect of relative needle diameter in puncture and sham injection animal models of degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(6):588-96. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318166e0a2. View

4.
Gardner-Morse M, Stokes I . Structural behavior of human lumbar spinal motion segments. J Biomech. 2004; 37(2):205-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.10.003. View

5.
Hunter C, Matyas J, Duncan N . Cytomorphology of notochordal and chondrocytic cells from the nucleus pulposus: a species comparison. J Anat. 2004; 205(5):357-62. PMC: 1571361. DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-8782.2004.00352.x. View