» Articles » PMID: 18492648

Sensitivity to Reward Loss As an Indicator of Animal Emotion and Welfare

Overview
Journal Biol Lett
Specialty Biology
Date 2008 May 22
PMID 18492648
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The scientific study of animal emotion is an important emerging discipline in subjects ranging from neuroscience to animal welfare research. In the absence of direct measures of conscious emotion, indirect behavioural and physiological measures are used. However, these may have significant limitations (e.g. indicating emotional arousal but not valence (positivity versus negativity)). A new approach, taking its impetus from human studies, proposes that biases in information processing, and underlying mechanisms relating to the evaluation of reward gains and losses, may reliably reflect emotional valence in animals. In general, people are more sensitive to reward losses than gains, but people in a negative affective state (e.g. depression) are particularly sensitive to losses. This may underlie broader findings such as an enhanced attention to, and memory of, negative events in depressed individuals. Here we show that rats in unenriched housing, who typically exhibit indicators of poorer welfare and a more negative affective state than those in enriched housing, display a prolonged response to a decrease in anticipated food reward, indicating enhanced sensitivity to reward loss. Sensitivity to reward reduction may thus be a valuable new indicator of animal emotion and welfare.

Citing Articles

Exploring breed differences in discrimination, reversal learning, and resistance to extinction in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris).

Azadian A, Protopopova A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24143.

PMID: 39407031 PMC: 11480501. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-76283-3.


Affective trajectories: Are hens influenced by positive and negative changes in their living conditions?.

Paul E, Browne W, Mendl M, Caplen G, Held S, Trevarthen A Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2024; 261:105883.

PMID: 39086993 PMC: 7616324. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2023.105883.


Effects of temporary access to environmental enrichment on measures of laboratory mouse welfare.

Ratuski A, Amendola L, Makowska I, Weary D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):15143.

PMID: 38956228 PMC: 11219853. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65480-9.


What if the reward is not as yummy? Study of the effects of Successive Negative Contrast in domestic dogs in two different tasks.

Dzik M, Carballo F, Cavalli C, Iglesias M, Farago T, Kubinyi E J Vet Behav. 2024; 72:18-27.

PMID: 38435337 PMC: 7615697. DOI: 10.1016/j.jveb.2023.12.009.


Trait sensitivity to stress and cognitive bias processes in fish: A brief overview.

Buenhombre J, Daza-Cardona E, Mota-Rojas D, Dominguez-Oliva A, Rivera A, Medrano-Galarza C Personal Neurosci. 2024; 7:e3.

PMID: 38384666 PMC: 10877277. DOI: 10.1017/pen.2023.14.


References
1.
Rosas J, Callejas-Aguilera J, Escarabajal M, Gomez M, de la Torre L, Aguero A . Successive negative contrast effect in instrumental runway behaviour: a study with Roman high- (RHA) and Roman low- (RLA) avoidance rats. Behav Brain Res. 2007; 185(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.07.027. View

2.
Paul E, Harding E, Mendl M . Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005; 29(3):469-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.01.002. View

3.
Hajcak G, McDonald N, Simons R . Error-related psychophysiology and negative affect. Brain Cogn. 2004; 56(2):189-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2003.11.001. View

4.
Peeters F, Nicolson N, Berkhof J, Delespaul P, deVries M . Effects of daily events on mood states in major depressive disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2003; 112(2):203-11. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.112.2.203. View

5.
Harding E, Paul E, Mendl M . Animal behaviour: cognitive bias and affective state. Nature. 2004; 427(6972):312. DOI: 10.1038/427312a. View