» Articles » PMID: 18491390

Impact of Polymer Hydrophilicity on Biocompatibility: Implication for DES Polymer Design

Overview
Date 2008 May 21
PMID 18491390
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Polymer coatings are essential for local delivery of drug from the stent platform. In designing a DES, it is critical to balance the hydrophilic and hydrophobic components of the polymer system to obtain optimal biocompatibility, while maintaining controlled drug elution. This study investigates the impact of polymer composition of the BioLinx polymer blend on in vitro biocompatibility, as measured by monocytic adhesion. Comparable evaluation was performed with polymers similar to those utilized in various DES that are currently being marketed. Relative hydrophilicities of polymer surfaces were determined through contact angle measurements and surface analyses. Polymer biocompatibility was evaluated in a novel in vitro assay system in which activated monocyte cells were exposed to polymer coated on 96-well plates. Enhanced monocyte adhesion was observed with polymers of a more hydrophobic nature, whereas those which were more hydrophilic did not induce activated monocyte adhesion. Our data supports the hypothesis that polymer composition is a feature that dictates in vitro biocompatibility as measured by monocyte driven inflammation. Monocyte adhesion has been shown to induce local inflammation as well as promote vascular cell proliferation factors contributing to in stent restenosis (Rogers et al., Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1996;16:1312-1318). Observed results suggest hydrophobic but not hydrophilic polymer surfaces support adhesion of activated monocytes to the polymer scaffold. The proprietary DES polymer blend BioLinx has a hydrophilic surface architecture and does not induce an inflammatory response as measured by these in vitro assays.

Citing Articles

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Sirolimus-Eluting Stent and Polymer-Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Yang O, Teng Y, Zhang R, Qu J Int J Nanomedicine. 2024; 19:11689-11700.

PMID: 39553456 PMC: 11566208. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S482608.


Temporal Trends in the Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Zotarolimus Eluting Stents Versus Everolimus Eluting Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Basit J, Ahmed M, Shafiq A, Zaheer Z, Nashwan A, Ahmed A Clin Cardiol. 2024; 47(6):e24306.

PMID: 38888152 PMC: 11184471. DOI: 10.1002/clc.24306.


Unraveling and Harnessing the Immune Response at the Cell-Biomaterial Interface for Tissue Engineering Purposes.

Ten Brink T, Damanik F, Rotmans J, Moroni L Adv Healthc Mater. 2024; 13(17):e2301939.

PMID: 38217464 PMC: 11468937. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202301939.


Potential application of inorganic nano-materials in modulation of macrophage function: Possible application in bone tissue engineering.

Mofarrah M, Jafari-Gharabaghlou D, Farhoudi-Sefidan-Jadid M, Zarghami N Heliyon. 2023; 9(6):e16309.

PMID: 37292328 PMC: 10245018. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16309.


Modulating neuroinflammation through molecular, cellular and biomaterial-based approaches to treat spinal cord injury.

Lee C, Chooi W, Ng S, Chew S Bioeng Transl Med. 2023; 8(2):e10389.

PMID: 36925680 PMC: 10013833. DOI: 10.1002/btm2.10389.