» Articles » PMID: 18491165

Maps of Interaural Time Difference in the Chicken's Brainstem Nucleus Laminaris

Overview
Journal Biol Cybern
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2008 May 21
PMID 18491165
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Animals, including humans, use interaural time differences (ITDs) that arise from different sound path lengths to the two ears as a cue of horizontal sound source location. The nature of the neural code for ITD is still controversial. Current models differentiate between two population codes: either a map-like rate-place code of ITD along an array of neurons, consistent with a large body of data in the barn owl, or a population rate code, consistent with data from small mammals. Recently, it was proposed that these different codes reflect optimal coding strategies that depend on head size and sound frequency. The chicken makes an excellent test case of this proposal because its physical prerequisites are similar to small mammals, yet it shares a more recent common ancestry with the owl. We show here that, like in the barn owl, the brainstem nucleus laminaris in mature chickens displayed the major features of a place code of ITD. ITD was topographically represented in the maximal responses of neurons along each isofrequency band, covering approximately the contralateral acoustic hemisphere. Furthermore, the represented ITD range appeared to change with frequency, consistent with a pressure gradient receiver mechanism in the avian middle ear. At very low frequencies, below 400 Hz, maximal neural responses were symmetrically distributed around zero ITD and it remained unclear whether there was a topographic representation. These findings do not agree with the above predictions for optimal coding and thus revive the discussion as to what determines the neural coding strategies for ITDs.

Citing Articles

Gharial acoustic signaling: Novel underwater pops are temporally based, context-dependent, seasonally stable, male-specific, and individually distinctive.

Ajji M J, Lang J J Anat. 2025; 246(3):415-443.

PMID: 39887971 PMC: 11828749. DOI: 10.1111/joa.14171.


Biological relevance and methodological implications of unexpected hearing thresholds in a diving bird.

Rossler H, May A, Dahne M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30592.

PMID: 39715765 PMC: 11666583. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82942-2.


Azimuthal sound localization in the chicken.

Maldarelli G, Firzlaff U, Luksch H PLoS One. 2022; 17(11):e0277190.

PMID: 36413534 PMC: 9681088. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277190.


Two Types of Auditory Spatial Receptive Fields in Different Parts of the Chicken's Midbrain.

Maldarelli G, Firzlaff U, Kettler L, Ondracek J, Luksch H J Neurosci. 2022; 42(23):4669-4680.

PMID: 35508384 PMC: 9186802. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2204-21.2022.


Non-Apoptotic Caspase Activity Preferentially Targets a Novel Consensus Sequence Associated With Cytoskeletal Proteins in the Developing Auditory Brainstem.

Weghorst F, Mirzakhanyan Y, Hernandez K, Gershon P, Cramer K Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022; 10:844844.

PMID: 35330912 PMC: 8940215. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.844844.


References
1.
Hancock K, Delgutte B . A physiologically based model of interaural time difference discrimination. J Neurosci. 2004; 24(32):7110-7. PMC: 2041891. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0762-04.2004. View

2.
Kubke M, Massoglia D, Carr C . Bigger brains or bigger nuclei? Regulating the size of auditory structures in birds. Brain Behav Evol. 2004; 63(3):169-80. PMC: 3269630. DOI: 10.1159/000076242. View

3.
SULLIVAN W, Konishi M . Neural map of interaural phase difference in the owl's brainstem. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986; 83(21):8400-4. PMC: 386936. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.83.21.8400. View

4.
Koppl C, Carr C . Low-frequency pathway in the barn owl's auditory brainstem. J Comp Neurol. 1997; 378(2):265-82. View

5.
Spitzer M, Semple M . Neurons sensitive to interaural phase disparity in gerbil superior olive: diverse monaural and temporal response properties. J Neurophysiol. 1995; 73(4):1668-90. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1995.73.4.1668. View