» Articles » PMID: 18486772

Thinned Anterolateral Thigh Cutaneous Flap and Radial Fasciocutaneous Forearm Flap for Reconstruction of Oral Defects: Comparison of Donor Site Morbidity

Overview
Date 2008 May 20
PMID 18486772
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The thinned anterolateral thigh flap (tALT) has been utilized in clinical applications for soft tissue reconstruction. This flap has many advantages: no major artery is sacrificed; functional and esthetic results are often good. The purpose of this study is to investigate the esthetic outcome of the donor site after reconstruction of oral defects with tALT compared to the radial fasciocutaneous forearm flap (RFFF).

Patients And Methods: Between January 2003 and December 2005, 42 patients affected by oral squamous cell carcinoma (27 males, 15 females; age range: 34-82 years, mean age, 61.4 years) received microsurgical reconstruction. We treated 17 patients with RFFF and 25 cases with tALT.

Results: The RFFF group showed a success rate of 94.2% with only 1 total flap loss due to not reversible venous thrombosis. In the tALT group we accomplished a 100% flap survival. Functional results at donor site in the RFFF group showed a persistent forearm movement impairment in about 30% of cases and sensitivity alterations in skin graft area in 75% of patients; in the tALT group we noticed only a transitory gait impairment in 1 patient; no clinical signs of circulatory disturbance were observed and no sensory disturbance of the thigh was reported.

Conclusions: In our experience, we found the thinned ALT cutaneous flap the ideal soft tissue flap in oral reconstruction. This flap presents functional results at the receiving site with the additional advantage of minimal donor-site morbidity and a high level of patient satisfaction.

Citing Articles

Radial forearm flap versus antero-lateral thigh flap in oral soft tissue reconstruction: update and statistical analysis on our 77 consecutive cases for an objective selection criteria.

Marra C, Pinto V, Benanti E, De Maria F, Pinelli M, Spaggiari A Acta Biomed. 2023; 94(5):e2023252.

PMID: 37850757 PMC: 10644937. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v94i5.15174.


Comparison between free posterior tibial flap and free radial forearm flap for head and neck reconstruction: an anatomical study and a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Zhong Q, Fang J, Huang Z, Zhang Y, He S, Jin Y Ann Transl Med. 2022; 10(22):1231.

PMID: 36544636 PMC: 9761164. DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-5426.


Free Flap Selection and Outcomes of Soft Tissue Reconstruction Following Resection of Intra-oral Malignancy.

Young A, Bache S, Segaren N, Murphy S, Maraka J, Durrani A Front Surg. 2020; 6:53.

PMID: 31921882 PMC: 6932995. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00053.


Comparison of the subjective satisfaction of the donor site morbidity: Free radial forearm flap versus anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction in tongue cancer patients.

Meng L, Shen J, Liu H, Zhang J, Peng X, Mao C Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019; 24(2):e236-e242.

PMID: 30818317 PMC: 6441596. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.22679.


Comparison of Anterolateral Thigh and Radial Forearm Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Oranges C, Ling B, Tremp M, Wettstein R, Kalbermatten D, Schaefer D In Vivo. 2018; 32(4):893-897.

PMID: 29936476 PMC: 6117772. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11325.