Influence of Uncertainty and Surprise on Human Corticospinal Excitability During Preparation for Action

Overview

Journal Curr Biol

Publisher Cell Press

Specialty Biology

Date 2008 May 20

PMID 18485711

Citations 69

Authors

Sven Bestmann

Lee M Harrison

Felix Blankenburg

Rogier B Mars

Patrick Haggard

Karl J Friston

John C Rothwell

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Actions are guided by prior sensory information [1-10], which is inherently uncertain. However, how the motor system is sculpted by trial-by-trial content of current sensory information remains largely unexplored. Previous work suggests that conditional probabilities, learned under a particular context, can be used preemptively to influence the output of the motor system [11-14]. To test this we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to read out corticospinal excitability (CSE) during preparation for action in an instructed delay task [15, 16]. We systematically varied the uncertainty about an impending action by changing the validity of the instructive visual cue. We used two information-theoretic quantities to predict changes in CSE, prior to action, on a trial-by-trial basis: entropy (average uncertainty) and surprise (the stimulus-bound information conveyed by a visual cue) [17-19]. Our data show that during preparation for action, human CSE varies according to the entropy and surprise conveyed by visual events guiding action. CSE increases on trials with low entropy about the impending action and low surprise conveyed by an event. Commensurate effects were observed in reaction times. We suggest that motor output is biased according to contextual probabilities that are represented dynamically in the brain.

Citing Articles

Premovement activity in the corticospinal tract is amplified by the placebo effect: an active inference account.

Andani M, Braga M, Da Dalt F, Piedimonte A, Carlino E, Fiorio M Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025; 20(1).

PMID: 39891393 PMC: 11799862. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaf014.

Response and conflict expectations shape motor responses interactively.

Sauter A, Zabicki A, Schuller T, Baldermann J, Fink G, Mengotti P Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(11):2599-2612.

PMID: 39316096 PMC: 11527934. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06920-w.

The behavioral and neural effects of parietal theta burst stimulation on the grasp network are stronger during a grasping task than at rest.

Goldenkoff E, Deluisi J, Destiny D, Lee T, Michon K, Brissenden J Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1198222.

PMID: 37954875 PMC: 10637360. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1198222.

The Impact of the Perception of Primary Facial Emotions on Corticospinal Excitability.

Fiori F, Ciricugno A, Cattaneo Z, Ferrari C Brain Sci. 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37759892 PMC: 10527337. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13091291.

What mechanisms mediate prior probability effects on rapid-choice decision-making?.

Puri R, Hinder M, Heathcote A PLoS One. 2023; 18(7):e0288085.

PMID: 37418378 PMC: 10328325. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288085.

References

Bays P, Wolpert D . Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability. J Physiol. 2006; 578(Pt 2):387-96. PMC: 2075158. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.120121. View

Bastian A, Riehle A, Erlhagen W, Schoner G . Prior information preshapes the population representation of movement direction in motor cortex. Neuroreport. 1998; 9(2):315-9. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199801260-00025. View

Harrison L, Duggins A, Friston K . Encoding uncertainty in the hippocampus. Neural Netw. 2006; 19(5):535-46. PMC: 2640484. DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2005.11.002. View

Wise S, Weinrich M, Mauritz K . Motor aspects of cue-related neuronal activity in premotor cortex of the rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 1983; 260(2):301-5. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(83)90685-6. View

Nakamura K . Neural representation of information measure in the primate premotor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2006; 96(1):478-85. DOI: 10.1152/jn.01326.2005. View

Behrens T, Woolrich M, Walton M, Rushworth M . Learning the value of information in an uncertain world. Nat Neurosci. 2007; 10(9):1214-21. DOI: 10.1038/nn1954. View

Salinas E, Romo R . Conversion of sensory signals into motor commands in primary motor cortex. J Neurosci. 1998; 18(1):499-511. PMC: 6793422. View

Requin J, GRANJON M . The effect of conditional probability of the response signal on the simple reaction time. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1969; 31(2):129-44. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(69)90074-2. View

Terao Y, Furubayashi T, Okabe S, Mochizuki H, Arai N, Kobayashi S . Modifying the cortical processing for motor preparation by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007; 19(9):1556-73. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1556. View

10.

Prut Y, Fetz E . Primate spinal interneurons show pre-movement instructed delay activity. Nature. 1999; 401(6753):590-4. DOI: 10.1038/44145. View

11.

Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Pilato F, Saturno E, Dileone M, Mazzone P . The physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 115(2):255-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.10.009. View

12.

Kording K, Wolpert D . Probabilistic mechanisms in sensorimotor control. Novartis Found Symp. 2006; 270:191-8. View

13.

Cisek P . Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007; 362(1485):1585-99. PMC: 2440773. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2054. View

14.

Roux S, MacKay W, Riehle A . The pre-movement component of motor cortical local field potentials reflects the level of expectancy. Behav Brain Res. 2006; 169(2):335-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.02.004. View

15.

Friston K, Kilner J, Harrison L . A free energy principle for the brain. J Physiol Paris. 2006; 100(1-3):70-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.10.001. View

16.

Yang T, Shadlen M . Probabilistic reasoning by neurons. Nature. 2007; 447(7148):1075-80. DOI: 10.1038/nature05852. View

17.

Huettel S, Song A, McCarthy G . Decisions under uncertainty: probabilistic context influences activation of prefrontal and parietal cortices. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(13):3304-11. PMC: 6724903. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5070-04.2005. View

18.

Rubino D, Robbins K, Hatsopoulos N . Propagating waves mediate information transfer in the motor cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2006; 9(12):1549-57. DOI: 10.1038/nn1802. View

19.

Carpenter R . Contrast, probability, and saccadic latency; evidence for independence of detection and decision. Curr Biol. 2004; 14(17):1576-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.08.058. View

20.

Naatanen R . The diminishing time-uncertainty with the lapse of time after the warning signal in reaction-time experiments with varying fore-periods. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1970; 34(4):399-419. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90035-1. View