» Articles » PMID: 18479381

The Effectiveness of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Calcium Hydroxide and Formocresol for Pulpotomies in Primary Teeth

Overview
Journal Int Endod J
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2008 May 16
PMID 18479381
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), calcium hydroxide (CH) and formocresol (FC) as pulp dressing agents in carious primary teeth.

Methodology: Forty-five primary mandibular molars with dental caries in 23 children [AUTHOR QUERY: How many children?] between 5 and 9 years old were treated by a conventional pulpotomy technique. The teeth were randomly assigned to the experimental (CH or MTA) or control (FC) groups. After coronal pulp removal and haemostasis, remaining pulp tissue was covered with MTA paste or CH powder in the experimental groups. In the control group, diluted FC was placed with a cotton pellet over the pulp tissue for 5 min and removed; the pulp tissue was then covered with zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE) paste. All teeth were restored with reinforced ZOE base and resin modified glass-ionomer cement. Clinical and radiographic successes and failures were recorded at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 month follow-up.

Results: Forty-three teeth were available for follow-up. In the FC and MTA groups, 100% of the available teeth were clinically and radiographically successful at all follow-up appointments; dentine bridge formation could be detected in 29% of the teeth treated with MTA. In the CH group, 64% of the teeth presented clinical and radiographic failures detected throughout the follow-up period, and internal resorption was a frequent radiographic finding.

Conclusions: Mineral trioxide aggregate was superior to CH and equally as effective as FC as a pulpotomy dressing in primary mandibular molars. Internal resorption was the most common radiographic finding up to 24 month after pulpotomies performed with CH.

Citing Articles

Pulpotomy in primary teeth: Biodentine™ versus calcium hydroxide. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laser M, Hijazi Alsadi T, Muwaquet Rodriguez F, Muwaquet Rodriguez S Saudi Dent J. 2024; 36(10):1261-1267.

PMID: 39525930 PMC: 11544380. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.08.007.


Comparative Analysis of Calcium and Hydroxyl Ion Release from Pulp Dressing Materials in Pulpotomized Premolars.

Alaajam W, Abdelaziz K, Khalil A, Abouzeid H, Alwadai G, Daghrery A Med Sci Monit. 2024; 30:e945089.

PMID: 39340141 PMC: 11446174. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945089.


Efficacy of orthoMTA, retroMTA and ferric sulphate as pulpotomy agents in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial.

Yilmaz S, Keles S Eur Oral Res. 2023; 57(3):144-150.

PMID: 37929220 PMC: 10622155. DOI: 10.26650/eor.2023950004.


Evaluation of the reasons for failure in teeth with vital amputation treatment.

Yildiz S, Dogan M, Dogan M BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):455.

PMID: 37415166 PMC: 10327274. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03171-z.


Comparison between the Radiographic and Clinical Rates of Success for TheraCal and MTA in Primary Tooth Pulpotomy within a 12-Month Follow-Up: A Split-Mouth Clinical Trial.

Hassanpour S, Aminabadi N, Rahbar M, Erfanparast L Biomed Res Int. 2023; 2023:8735145.

PMID: 37124935 PMC: 10132897. DOI: 10.1155/2023/8735145.