» Articles » PMID: 18469225

Optimization of Graft Fixation at the Time of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Part II: Effect of Knee Flexion Angle

Overview
Journal Am J Sports Med
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2008 May 13
PMID 18469225
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is no consensus about flexion angle of the knee at the time of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of flexion angle at the final graft fixation on the positional relationship as well as the load between femur and tibia.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Six intact cadaveric knees were passively flexed and extended under 6 degrees of freedom with the robotic system developed in our laboratory, while their 3-dimensional paths were recorded. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed with a single-socket technique using autogenous quadrupled hamstring tendons, while the graft was fixed at 0 degrees (group A), 20 degrees (group B), or 90 degrees (group C) with a constant initial tension of 44 N. The knees then repeated the same movement as before while the relative position between femur and tibia was recorded. The load in the femorotibial joint was also calculated based on the principle of superposition.

Results: Posterior displacement of the tibia compared with the normal knee was the smallest in group B at all flexion angles, while the load between tibia and femur in group B was also the smallest and the closest to the normal knee.

Conclusion: As the positional relationship as well as the load between femur and tibia in group B was the closest to that in the normal knee, 20 degrees of flexion is the most desirable of the positions tested for graft tensioning and fixation at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Clinical Relevance: The tibia-femur position is well retained when the graft was fixed at 20 degrees of flexion in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Citing Articles

Dynamic Deformation Behavior of the Porcine Anterior Cruciate Ligament Enthesis Under Anterior Tibial Loading.

Ishii D, Sato S, Fujie H Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 53(3):588-596.

PMID: 39604621 PMC: 11836234. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03654-2.


No Difference in Knee Kinematics Between Anterior Cruciate Ligament-First and Posterior Cruciate Ligament-First Fixation During Single-Stage Multiligament Knee Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study.

Fayed A, Kanto R, Price T, DiNenna M, Linde M, Smolinski P Orthop J Sports Med. 2022; 10(9):23259671221118587.

PMID: 36186708 PMC: 9523854. DOI: 10.1177/23259671221118587.


Evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament surgical reconstruction through finite element analysis.

Risvas K, Stanev D, Benos L, Filip K, Tsaopoulos D, Moustakas K Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):8044.

PMID: 35577879 PMC: 9110399. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11601-1.


Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction.

Flury A, Wild L, Waltenspul M, Zindel C, Vlachopoulos L, Imhoff F Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022; 143(4):1923-1930.

PMID: 35287180 PMC: 10030456. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04408-2.


Tibial-graft fixation methods on anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a literature review.

Pereira V, Medeiros J, Nunes G, Oliveira G, Nicolini A Knee Surg Relat Res. 2021; 33(1):7.

PMID: 33648610 PMC: 7923495. DOI: 10.1186/s43019-021-00089-0.