Effects of Stressor Controllability on Psychophysiological, Cognitive and Behavioural Responses in Patients with Major Depression and Dysthymia

Overview

Journal Psychol Med

Publisher Cambridge University Press

Specialty Psychology

Date 2008 May 10

PMID 18466665

Citations 15

Authors

C Diener

C Kuehner

W Brusniak

M Struve

H Flor

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The experience of uncontrollability and helplessness in the face of stressful life events is regarded as an important determinant in the development and maintenance of depression. The inability to successfully deal with stressors might be linked to dysfunctional prefrontal functioning. We assessed cognitive, behavioural and physiological effects of stressor uncontrollability in depressed and healthy individuals. In addition, relationships between altered cortical processing and cognitive vulnerability traits of depression were analysed.

Method: A total of 26 unmedicated depressed patients and 24 matched healthy controls were tested in an expanded forewarned reaction (S1-S2) paradigm. In a factorial design, stressor controllability varied across three consecutive conditions: (a) control, (b) loss of control and (c) restitution of control. Throughout the experiment, error rates, ratings of controllability, arousal, emotional valence and helplessness were assessed together with the post-imperative negative variation (PINV) of the electroencephalogram.

Results: Depressed participants showed an enhanced frontal PINV as an electrophysiological index of altered information processing during both loss of control and restitution of control. They also felt more helpless than controls. Furthermore, frontal PINV magnitudes were associated with habitual rumination in the depressed subsample.

Conclusions: These findings indicate that depressed patients are more susceptible to stressor uncontrollability than healthy subjects. Moreover, the experience of uncontrollability seems to bias subsequent information processing in a situation where control is objectively re-established. Alterations in prefrontal functioning appear to contribute to this vulnerability and are also linked to trait markers of depression.

Citing Articles

Neurobiology and systems biology of stress resilience.

Kalisch R, Russo S, Muller M Physiol Rev. 2024; 104(3):1205-1263.

PMID: 38483288 PMC: 11381009. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00042.2023.

Mechanisms of change in treatments for transdiagnostic emotion dysregulation: The roles of skills use, perceived control and mindfulness.

Wyatt K, Eberle J, Ruork A, Neacsiu A Clin Psychol Psychother. 2023; 30(6):1380-1392.

PMID: 37408301 PMC: 11295203. DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2879.

Stress-sensitive inference of task controllability.

Ligneul R, Mainen Z, Ly V, Cools R Nat Hum Behav. 2022; 6(6):812-822.

PMID: 35273354 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01306-w.

Prefrontal cortex and depression.

Pizzagalli D, Roberts A Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021; 47(1):225-246.

PMID: 34341498 PMC: 8617037. DOI: 10.1038/s41386-021-01101-7.

The controllability of aversive and neutral pictures: an event-related potential study.

Bauer E, Thomas G, MacNamara A Behav Brain Res. 2021; 408:113265.

PMID: 33794224 PMC: 8102394. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113265.

References

Nuwer M, Comi G, Emerson R, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, Guerit J, Hinrichs H . IFCN standards for digital recording of clinical EEG. International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998; 106(3):259-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4694(97)00106-5. View

Kathmann N, Jonitz L, Engel R . Cognitive determinants of the postimperative negative variation. Psychophysiology. 1990; 27(3):256-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb00380.x. View

Matsuo K, Glahn D, Peluso M, Hatch J, Monkul E, Najt P . Prefrontal hyperactivation during working memory task in untreated individuals with major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2006; 12(2):158-66. DOI: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001894. View

Wagner G, Sinsel E, Sobanski T, Kohler S, Marinou V, Mentzel H . Cortical inefficiency in patients with unipolar depression: an event-related FMRI study with the Stroop task. Biol Psychiatry. 2006; 59(10):958-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.10.025. View

Verleger R, Wascher E, Arolt V, Daase C, Strohm A, Kompf D . Slow EEG potentials (contingent negative variation and post-imperative negative variation) in schizophrenia: their association to the present state and to Parkinsonian medication effects. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999; 110(7):1175-92. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00023-1. View

Harvey P, Fossati P, Pochon J, Levy R, Lebastard G, Lehericy S . Cognitive control and brain resources in major depression: an fMRI study using the n-back task. Neuroimage. 2005; 26(3):860-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.048. View

Rose E, Simonotto E, Ebmeier K . Limbic over-activity in depression during preserved performance on the n-back task. Neuroimage. 2005; 29(1):203-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.002. View

Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier J . Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989; 72(2):184-7. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90180-6. View

Hamilton M . A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960; 23:56-62. PMC: 495331. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56. View

10.

Chiu P, Deldin P . Neural evidence for enhanced error detection in major depressive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2007; 164(4):608-16. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.4.608. View

11.

Nolen-Hoeksema S, Morrow J . A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991; 61(1):115-21. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.1.115. View

12.

Hugdahl K, Rund B, Lund A, Asbjornsen A, Egeland J, Ersland L . Brain activation measured with fMRI during a mental arithmetic task in schizophrenia and major depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2004; 161(2):286-93. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.2.286. View

13.

Rockstroh B, Elbert T, Lutzenberger W, Birbaumer N . Slow cortical potentials under conditions of uncontrollability. Psychophysiology. 1979; 16(4):374-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1979.tb01481.x. View

14.

Lutzenberger W, Elbert T, Rockstroh B, Birbaumer N, Stegagno L . Slow cortical potentials in subjects with high or low scores on questionnaire measuring physical anhedonia and body image distortion. Psychophysiology. 1981; 18(4):371-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb02468.x. View

15.

Bolz J, Giedke H . Controllability of an aversive stimulus in depressed patients and health controls: a study using slow brain potentials. Biol Psychiatry. 1981; 16(5):441-52. View

16.

Gratton G, Coles M, Donchin E . A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983; 55(4):468-84. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9. View

17.

Czeh B, Michaelis T, Watanabe T, Frahm J, de Biurrun G, van Kampen M . Stress-induced changes in cerebral metabolites, hippocampal volume, and cell proliferation are prevented by antidepressant treatment with tianeptine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(22):12796-801. PMC: 60133. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.211427898. View

18.

Alfonso J, Frasch A, Flugge G . Chronic stress, depression and antidepressants: effects on gene transcription in the hippocampus. Rev Neurosci. 2005; 16(1):43-56. DOI: 10.1515/revneuro.2005.16.1.43. View

19.

Luu P, Tucker D, Derryberry D, Reed M, Poulsen C . Electrophysiological responses to errors and feedback in the process of action regulation. Psychol Sci. 2003; 14(1):47-53. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.01417. View

20.

Elbert T, Rockstroh B, Lutzenberger W, Birbaumer N . Slow brain potentials after withdrawal of control. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970). 1982; 232(3):201-14. DOI: 10.1007/BF02141781. View