The Case for Common Reference Intervals
Overview
Affiliations
The current paradigm for pathology reference intervals is for each laboratory to determine its own interval for use with each test offered by the laboratory. It is our contention that this approach does not best serve the medical community, especially at a time when electronic databases of health information are being expanded and integrated. We also believe that this approach is not performed well in many laboratories and is excessively expensive in practice. In contrast, we believe that the preferable option is to develop and apply common reference intervals throughout Australia and New Zealand, together with common reporting formats and assay standardisation wherever this is possible. We are aware that these are neither trivial nor simple issues, however we believe that failure to achieve this goal where technically possible will be a failure of the pathology profession to meet the challenges of the modern health community.
Martinez-Sanchez L, Marques-Garcia F, Ozarda Y, Blanco A, Brouwer N, Canalias F Adv Lab Med. 2023; 2(1):9-25.
PMID: 37359198 PMC: 10197285. DOI: 10.1515/almed-2020-0034.
Preparing Laboratories for Interconnected Health Care.
Bietenbeck A, Streichert T Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(8).
PMID: 34441421 PMC: 8391810. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081487.
Circulating Interleukin-37 Levels in Healthy Adult Humans - Establishing a Reference Range.
Santarelli D, Vincent F, Rudloff I, Nold-Petry C, Nold M, Russo M Front Immunol. 2021; 12:708425.
PMID: 34367169 PMC: 8343013. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.708425.
Generating method-specific Reference Ranges - A harmonious outcome?.
Lee G, Griffin A, Halton K, Fitzgibbon M Pract Lab Med. 2017; 9:1-11.
PMID: 29034300 PMC: 5633846. DOI: 10.1016/j.plabm.2017.06.001.
Calculated Chemistry Parameters - do they need to be harmonised?.
Hughes D, Doery J, Choy K, Flatman R Clin Biochem Rev. 2016; 37(3):131-134.
PMID: 27872507 PMC: 5111245.