» Articles » PMID: 18458709

The Case for Common Reference Intervals

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2008 May 7
PMID 18458709
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The current paradigm for pathology reference intervals is for each laboratory to determine its own interval for use with each test offered by the laboratory. It is our contention that this approach does not best serve the medical community, especially at a time when electronic databases of health information are being expanded and integrated. We also believe that this approach is not performed well in many laboratories and is excessively expensive in practice. In contrast, we believe that the preferable option is to develop and apply common reference intervals throughout Australia and New Zealand, together with common reporting formats and assay standardisation wherever this is possible. We are aware that these are neither trivial nor simple issues, however we believe that failure to achieve this goal where technically possible will be a failure of the pathology profession to meet the challenges of the modern health community.

Citing Articles

Big data and reference intervals: rationale, current practices, harmonization and standardization prerequisites and future perspectives of indirect determination of reference intervals using routine data.

Martinez-Sanchez L, Marques-Garcia F, Ozarda Y, Blanco A, Brouwer N, Canalias F Adv Lab Med. 2023; 2(1):9-25.

PMID: 37359198 PMC: 10197285. DOI: 10.1515/almed-2020-0034.


Preparing Laboratories for Interconnected Health Care.

Bietenbeck A, Streichert T Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(8).

PMID: 34441421 PMC: 8391810. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081487.


Circulating Interleukin-37 Levels in Healthy Adult Humans - Establishing a Reference Range.

Santarelli D, Vincent F, Rudloff I, Nold-Petry C, Nold M, Russo M Front Immunol. 2021; 12:708425.

PMID: 34367169 PMC: 8343013. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.708425.


Generating method-specific Reference Ranges - A harmonious outcome?.

Lee G, Griffin A, Halton K, Fitzgibbon M Pract Lab Med. 2017; 9:1-11.

PMID: 29034300 PMC: 5633846. DOI: 10.1016/j.plabm.2017.06.001.


Calculated Chemistry Parameters - do they need to be harmonised?.

Hughes D, Doery J, Choy K, Flatman R Clin Biochem Rev. 2016; 37(3):131-134.

PMID: 27872507 PMC: 5111245.


References
1.
Colman P, Thomas D, Zimmet P, Welborn T, Moore M . New classification and criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Position Statement from the Australian Diabetes Society, New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes, Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia and Australasian Association of.... Med J Aust. 1999; 170(8):375-8. View

2.
Solberg H . A guide to IFCC recommendations on reference values. J Int Fed Clin Chem. 1993; 5(4):162-5. View

3.
Lahti A, Petersen P, Boyd J, Fraser C, Jorgensen N . Objective criteria for partitioning Gaussian-distributed reference values into subgroups. Clin Chem. 2002; 48(2):338-52. View

4.
Hawkins R, Johnson R . The significance of significant figures. Clin Chem. 1990; 36(5):824. View

5.
Cruz-Carlos L, Monge-Azemar N, Fuentes-Arderiu X . Report of the II European symposium on clinical laboratory and in vitro diagnostics industry: "physiological reference values: a shared business?". Clin Chim Acta. 2003; 338(1-2):165-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cccn.2003.09.001. View