» Articles » PMID: 18453797

Diagnostic Thresholds for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Moving Lower: a Review Based on a Meta-analysis-clinical Implications

Overview
Date 2008 May 6
PMID 18453797
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Upper limits of normal ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) have been a matter of debate in recent years. Current diagnostic thresholds for ABP rely mainly on statistical parameters derived from reference populations. Recent findings from the International Database of Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcome (IDACO) provide outcome-driven thresholds for ABP. Rounded systolic/diastolic thresholds for optimal ABP were found to be 115/75 mm Hg for 24 hours, 120/80 mm Hg for daytime, and 100/65 mm Hg for nighttime. The corresponding rounded thresholds for normal ABP were 125/75 mm Hg, 130/85 mm Hg, and 110/70 mm Hg, respectively, and those for ambulatory hypertension were 130/80 mm Hg, 140/85 mm Hg, and 120/70 mm Hg. However, in clinical practice, any diagnostic threshold for blood pressure needs to be assessed in the context of the patient's overall risk profile. The IDACO database is therefore being updated with additional population cohorts to enable the construction of multifactorial risk score charts, which also include ABP.

Citing Articles

Isolated Diastolic Hypertension in the IDACO Study: An Age-Stratified Analysis Using 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements.

McEvoy J, Yang W, Thijs L, Zhang Z, Melgarejo J, Boggia J Hypertension. 2021; 78(5):1222-1231.

PMID: 34601965 PMC: 8516806. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17766.


Identifying alternative models of healthcare service delivery to inform health system improvement: scoping review of systematic reviews.

Jessup R, Putrik P, Buchbinder R, Nezon J, Rischin K, Cyril S BMJ Open. 2020; 10(3):e036112.

PMID: 32229525 PMC: 7170607. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036112.


A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicentre Trial of the Effects of a Shrimp Protein Hydrolysate on Blood Pressure.

Musa-Veloso K, Paulionis L, Pelipyagina T, Evans M Int J Hypertens. 2019; 2019:2345042.

PMID: 31467699 PMC: 6699271. DOI: 10.1155/2019/2345042.


Alternative service models for delivery of healthcare services in high-income countries: a scoping review of systematic reviews.

Jessup R, OConnor D, Putrik P, Rischin K, Nezon J, Cyril S BMJ Open. 2019; 9(1):e024385.

PMID: 30700481 PMC: 6352783. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024385.


Diagnostic Thresholds for Blood Pressure Measured at Home in the Context of the 2017 Hypertension Guideline.

Vongpatanasin W, Ayers C, Lodhi H, Das S, Berry J, Khera A Hypertension. 2018; 72(6):1312-1319.

PMID: 30571225 PMC: 6309342. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11657.


References
1.
Wilson P, DAgostino R, Levy D, Belanger A, Silbershatz H, Kannel W . Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998; 97(18):1837-47. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.97.18.1837. View

2.
Wiinberg N, Hoegholm A, Christensen H, Bang L, Mikkelsen K, Nielsen P . 24-h ambulatory blood pressure in 352 normal Danish subjects, related to age and gender. Am J Hypertens. 1995; 8(10 Pt 1):978-86. DOI: 10.1016/0895-7061(95)00216-2. View

3.
Staessen , Bieniaszewski , OBrien , Imai , FAGARD . An epidemiological approach to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring:the Belgian Population Study. Blood Press Monit. 1996; 1(1):13-26. View

4.
Bjorklund K, Lind L, Zethelius B, Andren B, Lithell H . Isolated ambulatory hypertension predicts cardiovascular morbidity in elderly men. Circulation. 2003; 107(9):1297-302. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000054622.45012.12. View

5.
Bjorklund K, Lind L, Lithell H . Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure in a population of elderly men. J Intern Med. 2001; 248(6):501-10. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2000.00760.x. View