» Articles » PMID: 18448099

Misdirection of Regenerating Motor Axons After Nerve Injury and Repair in the Rat Sciatic Nerve Model

Overview
Journal Exp Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2008 May 2
PMID 18448099
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Misdirection of regenerating axons is one of the factors that can explain the poor results often found after nerve injury and repair. In this study, we quantified the degree of misdirection and the effect on recovery of function after different types of nerve injury and repair in the rat sciatic nerve model; crush injury, direct coaptation, and autograft repair. Sequential tracing with retrograde labeling of the peroneal nerve before and 8 weeks after nerve injury and repair was performed to quantify the accuracy of motor axon regeneration. Digital video analysis of ankle motion was used to investigate the recovery of function. In addition, serial compound action potential recordings and nerve and muscle morphometry were performed. In our study, accuracy of motor axon regeneration was found to be limited; only 71% (+/-4.9%) of the peroneal motoneurons were correctly directed 2 months after sciatic crush injury, 42% (+/-4.2%) after direct coaptation, and 25% (+/-6.6%) after autograft repair. Recovery of ankle motion was incomplete after all types of nerve injury and repair and demonstrated a disturbed balance of ankle plantar and dorsiflexion. The number of motoneurons from which axons had regenerated was not significantly different from normal. The number of myelinated axons was significantly increased distal to the site of injury. Misdirection of regenerating motor axons is a major factor in the poor recovery of nerves that innervate different muscles. The results of this study can be used as basis for developing new nerve repair techniques that may improve the accuracy of regeneration.

Citing Articles

Exosomes: new targets for understanding axon guidance in the developing central nervous system.

Liu M, Teng T Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025; 12():1510862.

PMID: 39850798 PMC: 11754257. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1510862.


Brief Electrical Stimulation Promotes Recovery after Surgical Repair of Injured Peripheral Nerves.

Gordon T Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(1).

PMID: 38203836 PMC: 10779324. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25010665.


Treadmill training of rats after sciatic nerve graft does not alter accuracy of muscle reinnervation.

Barham M, Andermahr J, Majczynski H, Slawinska U, Vogt J, Neiss W Front Neurol. 2023; 13:1050822.

PMID: 36742044 PMC: 9893025. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1050822.


Repair of Long Peripheral Nerve Defects in Sheep: A Translational Model for Nerve Regeneration.

Contreras E, Traserra S, Bolivar S, Fores J, Jose-Cunilleras E, Delgado-Martinez I Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(2).

PMID: 36674848 PMC: 9863630. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24021333.


The Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Nerve Regeneration Following Peripheral Nerve Injury.

Juckett L, Saffari T, Ormseth B, Senger J, Moore A Biomolecules. 2022; 12(12).

PMID: 36551285 PMC: 9775635. DOI: 10.3390/biom12121856.


References
1.
Dyck P, LAMBERT E, Wood M, Linscheid R . Assessment of nerve regeneration and adaptation after median nerve reconnection and digital neurovascular flap transfer. Neurology. 1988; 38(10):1586-91. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.38.10.1586. View

2.
Varejao A, Cabrita A, Meek M, Bulas-Cruz J, Filipe V, Gabriel R . Ankle kinematics to evaluate functional recovery in crushed rat sciatic nerve. Muscle Nerve. 2003; 27(6):706-14. DOI: 10.1002/mus.10374. View

3.
Meyer R, Moskovitz A, Abrams R, Botte M . Inaccurate projection of rat soleus motoneurons: a comparison of nerve repair techniques. Muscle Nerve. 1997; 20(1):29-37. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199701)20:1<29::aid-mus4>3.0.co;2-j. View

4.
Swett J, Wikholm R, Blanks R, Swett A, Conley L . Motoneurons of the rat sciatic nerve. Exp Neurol. 1986; 93(1):227-52. DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(86)90161-5. View

5.
Sulaiman O, Midha R, Munro C, Matsuyama T, Al-Majed A, Gordon T . Chronic Schwann cell denervation and the presence of a sensory nerve reduce motor axonal regeneration. Exp Neurol. 2002; 176(2):342-54. DOI: 10.1006/exnr.2002.7928. View