» Articles » PMID: 18446521

Use of the Biopharmaceutical Classification System in Early Drug Development

Overview
Journal AAPS J
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2008 May 1
PMID 18446521
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) is not only a useful tool for obtaining waivers for in-vivo bioequivalence studies but also for decision making in the discovery and early development of new drugs. Measurement of solubility and permeability in the discovery/development settings is described. These data can be utilized for the preliminary BCS classification of pipeline compounds. A decision tree is described in the prioritization of salt and polymorph screening studies prior to in vivo studies in animals. For BCS class 1 and 3 compounds, polymorphism is less likely to impact on bioavailability. The polymorph screening study may be postponed after animal studies. The BCS classification can also be used in the design of animal and human formulations. A BCS-based animal formulation development decision tree is presented. A compound is triaged based on a series of decision points into one of the five formulation strategies. Human formulation has different requirements than animal formulation. A comparison between animal and human formulation strategies is presented. In conclusion, for non-BCS 1 compounds, the right-first-time polymorph and formulation selection ensures consistent pharmacokinetic performance and avoids bridging BA/BE studies. It is in line with FDA's initiative to reduce R&D cycle time through quality by design for pharmaceutical products.

Citing Articles

The Artificial Intelligence-Powered New Era in Pharmaceutical Research and Development: A Review.

Suriyaamporn P, Pamornpathomkul B, Patrojanasophon P, Ngawhirunpat T, Rojanarata T, Opanasopit P AAPS PharmSciTech. 2024; 25(6):188.

PMID: 39147952 DOI: 10.1208/s12249-024-02901-y.


Advancements in wound healing: integrating biomolecules, drug delivery carriers, and targeted therapeutics for enhanced tissue repair.

Rathna R, Kulandhaivel M Arch Microbiol. 2024; 206(4):199.

PMID: 38563993 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-024-03910-y.


A comparative study on vildagliptin brand and its generic equivalents using dissolution test as quality control measure tool.

Altoum G, Al-Enazi F, Abudahash M, Al-Fadhli R, Alenzi N Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2636.

PMID: 38302589 PMC: 10834493. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52674-4.


The Impact of Various Poly(vinylpyrrolidone) Polymers on the Crystallization Process of Metronidazole.

Orszulak L, Lamrani T, Tarnacka M, Hachula B, Jurkiewicz K, Ziola P Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(1).

PMID: 38276506 PMC: 10820696. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16010136.


Permeation Protection by Waterproofing Mucosal Membranes.

Coderch L, Alonso C, Calpena A, Perez-Garcia M, Clares-Naveros B, Ramos A Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(12).

PMID: 38140039 PMC: 10747729. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15122698.


References
1.
Balimane P, Han Y, Chong S . Current industrial practices of assessing permeability and P-glycoprotein interaction. AAPS J. 2006; 8(1):E1-13. PMC: 2751418. DOI: 10.1208/aapsj080101. View

2.
Amidon G, Lennernas H, Shah V, Crison J . A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm Res. 1995; 12(3):413-20. DOI: 10.1023/a:1016212804288. View

3.
Artursson P, Palm K, Luthman K . Caco-2 monolayers in experimental and theoretical predictions of drug transport. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001; 46(1-3):27-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00128-9. View

4.
Lipinski C, Lombardo F, Dominy B, Feeney P . Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001; 46(1-3):3-26. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0. View

5.
Bevan C, Lloyd R . A high-throughput screening method for the determination of aqueous drug solubility using laser nephelometry in microtiter plates. Anal Chem. 2000; 72(8):1781-7. DOI: 10.1021/ac9912247. View