Prevalence and Functional Impact of Patient-perceived Leg Length Discrepancy After Hip Replacement

Overview

Journal Int Orthop

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2008 Apr 26

PMID 18437379

Citations 51

Authors

V Wylde

S L Whitehouse

A H Taylor

G T Pattison

G C Bannister

A W Blom

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The aim of this postal survey was to determine the prevalence and impact of patient-perceived leg length discrepancy (LLD) at 5-8 years after primary total hip replacement (THR). A postal audit survey was undertaken of all consecutive patients who had a primary unilateral THR at one elective orthopaedic centre between April 1993 and April 1996. The questionnaire included the Oxford hip score (OHS) and questions about LLD. Questionnaires were received from 1,114 patients. In total, 329 THR patients (30%) reported an LLD, although radiographic analysis revealed that only 36% of these patients had anatomical LLD. Patients with a perceived LLD had a significantly poorer OHS (p < 0.001) and reported more limping than those patients without a perceived LLD. This study found that a third of patients perceived an LLD after THR and that perceived LLD was associated with a significantly poorer midterm functional outcome.

Citing Articles

Scanogram leg length measurement after total hip arthroplasty: not all landmarks are created equal.

Le B, Bourgeault-Gagnon Y, Lyons M, McCaffrey S, Salmon L, OSullivan M Skeletal Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39969600 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-025-04895-5.

Retrograde Femoral Lengthening Below a Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Burns D, LoPolito A, Hoellwarth J, Reif T, Fragomen A, Rozbruch S J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025; 9(2).

PMID: 39899739 PMC: 11781769. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00141.

Simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty results in smaller Leg length discrepancy than staged bilateral procedures.

Onoi Y, Hayashi S, Kuroda Y, Kamenaga T, Tsubosaka M, Nakano N Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 145(1):12.

PMID: 39666096 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05703-w.

Accuracy of leg length changes in total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based augmented reality navigation system.

Kobayashi G, Ichikawa S, Tone S, Naito Y, Sudo A, Hasegawa M Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 145(1):17.

PMID: 39666089 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05705-8.

Greater Trochanter Tip as an Anatomical Reference to Minimize Leg Length Discrepancy following Hip Arthroplasty.

Butarbutar J, Ivander G, Riantho A, Fidiasrianto K, Edward J, Tasya E Hip Pelvis. 2024; 36(4):302-309.

PMID: 39620571 PMC: 11638752. DOI: 10.5371/hp.2024.36.4.302.

References

Mantyselka P, Kumpusalo E, Ahonen R, Takala J . Patients' versus general practitioners' assessments of pain intensity in primary care patients with non-cancer pain. Br J Gen Pract. 2002; 51(473):995-7. PMC: 1314192. View

Ostendorf M, van Stel H, Buskens E, Schrijvers A, Marting L, Verbout A . Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(6):801-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b6.14950. View

Turula K, Friberg O, Lindholm T, Tallroth K, Vankka E . Leg length inequality after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; (202):163-8. View

Boutron I, Poiraudeau S, Ravaud J, Baron G, Revel M, Nizard R . Disability in adults with hip and knee arthroplasty: a French national community based survey. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003; 62(8):748-54. PMC: 1754638. DOI: 10.1136/ard.62.8.748. View

White T, Dougall T . Arthroplasty of the hip. Leg length is not important. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84(3):335-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b3.12460. View

Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D . Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996; 78(2):185-90. View

Konyves A, Bannister G . The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(2):155-7. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.87b2.14878. View

Austin M, Hozack W, Sharkey P, Rothman R . Stability and leg length equality in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18(3 Suppl 1):88-90. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2003.50073. View

Ware Jr J, Sherbourne C . The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30(6):473-83. View

10.

Nikolajsen L, Brandsborg B, Lucht U, Jensen T, Kehlet H . Chronic pain following total hip arthroplasty: a nationwide questionnaire study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006; 50(4):495-500. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00976.x. View

11.

Lucht U . The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001; 71(5):433-9. DOI: 10.1080/000164700317381081 . View

12.

Nilsdotter A, Petersson I, Roos E, Lohmander L . Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003; 62(10):923-30. PMC: 1754324. DOI: 10.1136/ard.62.10.923. View

13.

Barrack R, Paprosky W, Butler R, Palafox A, Szuszczewicz E, Myers L . Patients' perception of pain after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15(5):590-6. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2000.6634. View

14.

Harris W . Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969; 51(4):737-55. View

15.

Edeen J, Sharkey P, Alexander A . Clinical significance of leg-length inequality after total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1995; 24(4):347-51. View

16.

MacWilliam C, Yood M, Verner J, McCarthy B, Ward R . Patient-related risk factors that predict poor outcome after total hip replacement. Health Serv Res. 1996; 31(5):623-38. PMC: 1070145. View