» Articles » PMID: 18430642

Social Transmission of Nectar-robbing Behaviour in Bumble-bees

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2008 Apr 24
PMID 18430642
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Social transmission of acquired foraging techniques is rarely considered outside of a vertebrate context. Here, however, we show that nectar robbing by bumble-bees (Bombus terrestris)-an invertebrate behaviour of considerable ecological significance-has the potential to spread through a population at the accelerated rates typical of social transmission. Nectar robbing occurs when individuals either bite through the base of a flower to 'steal' nectar (primary robbing) or use robbing holes that others have made (secondary robbing). We found that experience of foraging from robbed flowers significantly promoted the development of primary robbing in previously legitimate foragers, thus implying that the acquisition of nectar robbing by one individual will facilitate its adoption in others. Our findings suggest that the positive feedback effects of social transmission may potentially play an ecologically important role in the relationship between plants and pollinators.

Citing Articles

Floral visitors of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.): Elucidating their nectar-robbing behaviour and impacts on the plant reproduction.

Layek U, Bhandari T, Das A, Karmakar P PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0300398.

PMID: 38635674 PMC: 11025750. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300398.


Bumblebees socially learn behaviour too complex to innovate alone.

Bridges A, Royka A, Wilson T, Lockwood C, Richter J, Juusola M Nature. 2024; 627(8004):572-578.

PMID: 38448580 PMC: 10954542. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07126-4.


Social Learning versus Individual Learning in the Division of Labour.

Khajehnejad M, Garcia J, Meyer B Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(5).

PMID: 37237552 PMC: 10215164. DOI: 10.3390/biology12050740.


Bumblebees acquire alternative puzzle-box solutions via social learning.

Bridges A, MaBouDi H, Procenko O, Lockwood C, Mohammed Y, Kowalewska A PLoS Biol. 2023; 21(3):e3002019.

PMID: 36881588 PMC: 9990933. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002019.


Impacts of Semiochemical Traps Designed for Boheman 1833 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on Nontarget Beneficial Entomofauna in Field Bean Crops.

Segers A, Noel G, Delanglez L, Caparros Megido R, Francis F Insects. 2023; 14(2).

PMID: 36835722 PMC: 9961048. DOI: 10.3390/insects14020153.


References
1.
Irwin R . The consequences of direct versus indirect species interactions to selection on traits: pollination and nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata. Am Nat. 2006; 167(3):315-28. DOI: 10.1086/499377. View

2.
Leadbeater E, Chittka L . Social learning in insects--from miniature brains to consensus building. Curr Biol. 2007; 17(16):R703-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.012. View

3.
Seppanen J, Forsman J, Monkkonen M, Thomson R . Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics. Ecology. 2007; 88(7):1622-33. DOI: 10.1890/06-1757.1. View

4.
Worden B, Papaj D . Flower choice copying in bumblebees. Biol Lett. 2006; 1(4):504-7. PMC: 1626359. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0368. View

5.
Leadbeater E, Chittka L . A new mode of information transfer in foraging bumblebees?. Curr Biol. 2005; 15(12):R447-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.011. View