An Experimental Study on Effects of Increased Ventilation Flow on Students' Perception of Indoor Environment in Computer Classrooms
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Unlabelled: The effects of ventilation in computer classrooms were studied with university students (n = 355) in a blinded study, 31% were women and 3.8% had asthma. Two classrooms had a higher air exchange (4.1-5.2 ac/h); two others had a lower air exchange (2.3-2.6 ac/h). After 1 week, ventilation conditions were shifted. The students reported environmental perceptions during the last hour. Room temperature, RH, CO2, PM10 and ultra-fine particles were measured simultaneously. Mean CO2 was 1185 ppm at lower and 922 ppm at higher air exchange. Mean temperature was 23.2 degrees C at lower and 22.1 degrees C at higher air exchange. After mutual adjustment (temperature, RH, CO2, air exchange), measured temperature was associated with a perception of higher temperature (P < 0.001), lower air movement (P < 0.001), and poorer air quality (P < 0.001). Higher air exchange was associated with a perception of lower temperature (P < 0.001), higher air movement (P = 0.001), and better air quality (P < 0.001). In the longitudinal analysis (n = 83), increased air exchange caused a perception of lower temperature (P = 0.002), higher air movement (P < 0.001), better air quality (P = 0.001), and less odor (P = 0.02). In conclusion, computer classrooms have CO2 levels above 1000 ppm and temperatures above 22 degrees C. Increased ventilation from 7 l/s per person to 10-13 l/s per person can improve thermal comfort and air quality.
Practical Implications: Computer classrooms are crowded indoor environments with a high thermal load from both students and computer equipment. It is important to control room temperature either by air conditioning, sun shields, or sufficiently high ventilation flow. A high ventilation flow is also crucial to achieving good perceived air quality. Personal ventilation flow should be at least 10 l/s. Possible loss of learning ability due to poor indoor air quality in university buildings deserves more attention.
Sanguinetti A, Outcault S, Pistochini T, Hoffacker M Indoor Air. 2022; 32(2):e12998.
PMID: 35170085 PMC: 9111572. DOI: 10.1111/ina.12998.
Byber K, Radtke T, Norback D, Hitzke C, Imo D, Schwenkglenks M Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 12:CD012219.
PMID: 34891215 PMC: 8664457. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012219.pub2.
Association between Four-Level Categorisation of Indoor Exposure and Perceived Indoor Air Quality.
Tahtinen K, Lappalainen S, Karvala K, Remes J, Salonen H Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(4).
PMID: 29617335 PMC: 5923721. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15040679.
Zhang X, Li F, Zhang L, Zhao Z, Norback D PLoS One. 2014; 9(11):e112933.
PMID: 25398002 PMC: 4232599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112933.
Wang J, Engvall K, Smedje G, Norback D PLoS One. 2014; 9(8):e105125.
PMID: 25136984 PMC: 4138153. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105125.