» Articles » PMID: 18422019

Quantification of Drug Choice with the Generalized Matching Law in Rhesus Monkeys

Overview
Date 2008 Apr 22
PMID 18422019
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The generalized matching law provides precise descriptions of choice, but has not been used to characterize choice between different doses of drugs or different classes of drugs. The current study examined rhesus monkeys' drug self-administration choices between identical drug doses, different doses, different drugs (cocaine, remifentanil, and methohexital), and between drug and drug-paired stimuli. The bias parameter of the generalized matching law was used to quantify preference for one reinforcer over another. Choice between identical drug doses yielded undermatching. Choices between 0.3 microg/kg/injection remifentanil and either 0.1 microg/kg/injection remifentanil or saline plus drug-paired stimuli revealed bias for the 0.3 microg/kg/injection dose. Choice was relatively insensitive to differences in random interval schedule value when one reinforcer was replaced with drug-paired stimulus presentations. Bias for 0.3 microg/kg/injection remifentanil over 10 microg/kg/injection cocaine was seen in one subject, and indifference was generally observed between 0.1 microg/kg/injection remifentanil and 56 microg/kg/injection cocaine and between 30 microg/kg/injection cocaine and 320 microg/kg/injection methohexital. These findings suggest the bias parameter may be useful in quantitatively measuring level of preference, which would be an advantage over concurrent FR procedures that often result in exclusive choice.

Citing Articles

Matching provides efficient decisions.

Kubanek J bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38464109 PMC: 10925186. DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.15.580481.


Characterization of operant social interaction in rats: effects of access duration, effort, peer familiarity, housing conditions, and choice between social interaction vs. food or remifentanil.

Chow J, Beacher N, Chabot J, Oke M, Venniro M, Lin D Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022; 239(7):2093-2108.

PMID: 35230469 PMC: 10724845. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-022-06064-1.


Relative reinforcing effects of cocaine and 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) under a concurrent access self-administration procedure in rats.

Seaman Jr R, Rice K, Collins G Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022; 232:109299.

PMID: 35063839 PMC: 8919706. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109299.


The impact of cocaine and heroin drug history on motivation and cue sensitivity in a rat model of polydrug abuse.

Crummy E, Donckels E, Baskin B, Bentzley B, Ferguson S Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019; 237(1):55-68.

PMID: 31463541 PMC: 7458349. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-019-05349-2.


Reinforcing effects of opioid/cannabinoid mixtures in rhesus monkeys responding under a food/drug choice procedure.

Maguire D, France C Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018; 235(8):2357-2365.

PMID: 29860612 PMC: 6045955. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-018-4932-6.


References
1.
Herrnstein R . Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961; 4:267-72. PMC: 1404074. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267. View

2.
Johanson C, Schuster C . A choice procedure for drug reinforcers: cocaine and methylphenidate in the rhesus monkey. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1975; 193(2):676-88. View

3.
Herrnstein R . On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970; 13(2):243-66. PMC: 1333768. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. View

4.
Woolverton W, Johanson C . Preference in rhesus monkeys given a choice between cocaine and d,l-cathinone. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984; 41(1):35-43. PMC: 1347954. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-i35. View

5.
Chelonis J, Logue A . Effects of response type on pigeons' sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount and reinforcer delay. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996; 66(3):297-309. PMC: 1284578. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-297. View