» Articles » PMID: 18418691

Human Cerebellar Responses to Brush and Heat Stimuli in Healthy and Neuropathic Pain Subjects

Overview
Journal Cerebellum
Publisher Springer
Specialty Neurology
Date 2008 Apr 18
PMID 18418691
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Though human pain imaging studies almost always demonstrate activation in the cerebellum, the role of the cerebellum in pain function is not well understood. Here we present results from two studies on the effects of noxious thermal heat and brush applied to the right side of the face in a group of healthy subjects (Group I) and a group of patients with neuropathic pain (Group II) who are more sensitive to both thermal and mechanical stimuli. Statistically significant activations and volumes of activations were defined in the cerebellum. Activated cerebellar structures were identified by colocalization of fMRI activation with the 'MRI Atlas of the Human Cerebellum'. Functional data (obtained using a 3T magnet) were defined in terms of maximum voxels and volume of activation in the cerebellum. Volume maps were then mapped onto two millimeter serial slices taken through the cerebellum in order to identify activation within regions defined by the activation volume. The data indicate that different regions of the cerebellum are involved in acute and chronic pain processing. Heat produces greater contralateral activation compared with brush, while brush resulted in more ipsilateral/bilateral cerebellar activation. Further, innocuous brush stimuli in healthy subjects produced decreased cerebellar activation in lobules concerned with somatosensory processing. The data also suggest a dichotomy of innocuous stimuli/sensorimotor cerebellum activation versus noxious experience/cognitive/limbic cerebellum activation. These results lead us to propose that the cerebellum may modulate the emotional and cognitive experience that distinguishes the perception of pain from the appreciation of innocuous sensory stimulation.

Citing Articles

A new vision of the role of the cerebellum in pain processing.

Prati J, Gianlorenco A J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2025; 132(4):537-546.

PMID: 39798004 DOI: 10.1007/s00702-024-02872-1.


Cerebellar Bergmann glia integrate noxious information and modulate nocifensive behaviors.

Kim S, Lee J, Jang M, Roh S, Kim S, Lee J Nat Neurosci. 2025; 28(2):336-345.

PMID: 39748107 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-024-01807-z.


Re-examining the Mysterious Role of the Cerebellum in Pain.

Li C, Keay K, Henderson L, Mychasiuk R J Neurosci. 2024; 44(17).

PMID: 38658164 PMC: 11044115. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1538-23.2024.


Gene expression changes in the cerebellum are associated with persistent post-injury pain in adolescent rats exposed to early life stress.

Salberg S, Li C, Beveridge J, Noel M, Yamakawa G, Mychasiuk R Neurobiol Pain. 2023; 14:100145.

PMID: 38099278 PMC: 10719517. DOI: 10.1016/j.ynpai.2023.100145.


Subcortical contributions to the sense of body ownership.

Crucianelli L, Reader A, Ehrsson H Brain. 2023; 147(2):390-405.

PMID: 37847057 PMC: 10834261. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad359.


References
1.
Choi J, Park S, Kim Y, Shin Y, Kwon J, Kim J . Different brain activation patterns to pain and pain-related unpleasantness during the menstrual cycle. Anesthesiology. 2006; 105(1):120-7. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200607000-00021. View

2.
Iwata N, Ugawa Y . The effects of cerebellar stimulation on the motor cortical excitability in neurological disorders: a review. Cerebellum. 2005; 4(4):218-23. DOI: 10.1080/14734220500277007. View

3.
Jackson P, Meltzoff A, Decety J . How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. Neuroimage. 2005; 24(3):771-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.006. View

4.
Braak H, Braak E, Yilmazer D, Bohl J . Functional anatomy of human hippocampal formation and related structures. J Child Neurol. 1996; 11(4):265-75. DOI: 10.1177/088307389601100402. View

5.
Schmahmann J . An emerging concept. The cerebellar contribution to higher function. Arch Neurol. 1991; 48(11):1178-87. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1991.00530230086029. View