Breast Cancer Subtype Approximated by Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER-2 is Associated with Local and Distant Recurrence After Breast-conserving Therapy
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: To determine whether breast cancer subtype is associated with outcome after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) consisting of lumpectomy and radiation therapy.
Patients And Methods: We studied 793 consecutive patients with invasive breast cancer who received BCT from July 1998 to December 2001. Among them, 97% had pathologically negative margins of resection, and 90% received adjuvant systemic therapy. No patient received adjuvant trastuzumab. Receptor status was used to approximate subtype: estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative = luminal A; ER+ or PR+ and HER-2+ = luminal B; ER-and PR -and HER-2+ = HER-2; and ER-and PR -and HER-2-= basal. Competing risks methodology was used to analyze time to local recurrence and distant metastases.
Results: Median follow-up was 70 months. The overall 5-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 1.8% (95% CI, 1.0 to 3.1); 0.8% (0.3, 2.2) for luminal A, 1.5% (0.2, 10) for luminal B, 8.4% (2.2, 30) for HER-2, and 7.1% (3.0, 16) for basal. On multivariable analysis (MVA) with luminal A as baseline, HER-2 (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = 9.2; 95% CI, 1.6 to 51; P = .012) and basal (AHR = 7.1; 95% CI, 1.6 to 31; P = .009) subtypes were associated with increased local recurrence. On MVA, luminal B (AHR = 2.9; 95% CI, 1.3 to 6.5; P = .007) and basal (AHR = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 5.2; P = .035) were associated with increased distant metastases.
Conclusion: Overall, the 5-year local recurrence rate after BCT was low, but varied by subtype as approximated using ER, PR, and HER-2 status. Local recurrence was particularly low for the luminal A subtype, but was less than 10% at 5 years for all subtypes. Although further follow-up is needed, these results may be useful in counseling patients about their anticipated outcome after BCT.
Madoz-Gurpide J, Serrano-Lopez J, Sanz-Alvarez M, Morales-Gallego M, Rodriguez-Pinilla S, Rovira A Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(4).
PMID: 40004024 PMC: 11855744. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26041559.
Aishajiang R, Liu Z, Liang Y, Du P, Wei Y, Zhuo X Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 12(7):e2407833.
PMID: 39721034 PMC: 11831504. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202407833.
Molecular subtype and risk of local recurrence after nipple‑sparing mastectomy for breast cancer.
Golijanin D, Radovanovic Z, Radovanovic D, dermanovic A, Starcevic S, dermanovic M Oncol Lett. 2024; 28(2):389.
PMID: 38966584 PMC: 11223028. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14522.
Tiong K, Luzhbin D, Yeang C BMC Bioinformatics. 2024; 25(1):209.
PMID: 38867193 PMC: 11167951. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-024-05825-3.
Impact of Pregnancy on Breast Cancer Features and Prognosis.
Bounous V, Minella C, Fuso L, Actis S, Petroni G, Sgro L Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(4):2305-2315.
PMID: 38668074 PMC: 11049015. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31040171.