» Articles » PMID: 18407267

Infectious Implications in the Porcine Model of Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) with PEG-tube Closure: a Quantitative Bacteriologic Study

Overview
Date 2008 Apr 15
PMID 18407267
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Obtaining reliable closure of transvisceral defects currently limits natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). PEG tubes are potential means of managing NOTES gastrotomies.

Objective: To determine the efficacy of PEG closure after NOTES.

Design: An experimental animal study.

Setting: A laboratory.

Interventions: The pigs received gastric lavage with saline solution, chloramphenicol, or no lavage, and then underwent transgastric NOTES peritoneoscopy. Cultures were obtained by endoscopy during the surgery. A sterile foreign body was left in the peritoneal cavity. The gastrotomy was closed with a 20F PEG tube. The animals were observed for 14 days and underwent sterile laparotomy. Cultures of the foreign body and the peritoneal cavity were obtained.

Main Outcome Measurements: Abscess rate, peritoneal quantitative cultures.

Results: After 1 exclusion for anesthetic complications, 19 animals underwent NOTES; 18 (94.7%) survived the entire postoperative period. One animal died on postoperative day 2 after the PEG tube dislodged. At 14 days, 5 animals (27.8%) had intra-abdominal abscesses, 8 (44.4%) had positive peritoneal cultures, and 9 (50%) foreign bodies were contaminated on culture. Infectious complications were not altered by the type of gastric lavage or peritoneal bacterial inoculum introduced at the time of surgery.

Limitation: An animal model.

Conclusions: PEG closure of a NOTES gastrotomy is associated with subclinical intra-abdominal abscess formation and can result in death when the tube is dislodged during the early postoperative period. Preprocedural gastric lavage does not alter the intra-abdominal bacterial burden introduced at the time of surgery or subsequent infectious outcomes in the porcine model. These concerning findings necessitate additional studies to determine if porcine models are appropriate and applicable to human subjects in the NOTES setting.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Inflammatory Response to Transgastric and Transcolonic NOTES.

Hucl T, Benes M, Kocik M, Splichalova A, Maluskova J, Krak M Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016; 2016:7320275.

PMID: 27403157 PMC: 4923531. DOI: 10.1155/2016/7320275.


An innovative procedure of laparoscope combined with endoscopy for gastrointestinal stromal tumor resection and cholecystectomy: A case report and literature review.

Yan Y, Li F, Gai Y, Liu Q Exp Ther Med. 2016; 11(4):1393-1398.

PMID: 27073455 PMC: 4812363. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2016.3064.


Endoscopic ultrasound-assisted direct peritoneal visualization with a small-caliber scope: A proof of concept study in a swine model.

Suzuki R, Bhutani M, Shin D, Irisawa A, Fleming J, Richards-Kortum R Endosc Ultrasound. 2014; 3(4):226-31.

PMID: 25485270 PMC: 4247530. DOI: 10.4103/2303-9027.144535.


NOTES for the management of an intra-abdominal abscess: transcolonic peritonoscopy and abscess drainage in a canine model.

Moustarah F, Talarico J, Zinc J, Gatmaitan P, Brethauer S Can J Surg. 2013; 56(3):159-66.

PMID: 23706846 PMC: 3672428. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.037111.


Oral chlorhexidine and microbial contamination during endoscopy: possible implications for transgastric surgery. A randomized, clinical trial.

Meller Donatsky A, Holzknecht B, Arpi M, Vilmann P, Meisner S, Jorgensen L Surg Endosc. 2013; 27(6):1914-22.

PMID: 23292558 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2686-5.