» Articles » PMID: 18391405

Exploring Structural Variability in X-ray Crystallographic Models Using Protein Local Optimization by Torsion-angle Sampling

Overview
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2008 Apr 9
PMID 18391405
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Modeling structural variability is critical for understanding protein function and for modeling reliable targets for in silico docking experiments. Because of the time-intensive nature of manual X-ray crystallographic refinement, automated refinement methods that thoroughly explore conformational space are essential for the systematic construction of structurally variable models. Using five proteins spanning resolutions of 1.0-2.8 A, it is demonstrated how torsion-angle sampling of backbone and side-chain libraries with filtering against both the chemical energy, using a modern effective potential, and the electron density, coupled with minimization of a reciprocal-space X-ray target function, can generate multiple structurally variable models which fit the X-ray data well. Torsion-angle sampling as implemented in the Protein Local Optimization Program (PLOP) has been used in this work. Models with the lowest R(free) values are obtained when electrostatic and implicit solvation terms are included in the effective potential. HIV-1 protease, calmodulin and SUMO-conjugating enzyme illustrate how variability in the ensemble of structures captures structural variability that is observed across multiple crystal structures and is linked to functional flexibility at hinge regions and binding interfaces. An ensemble-refinement procedure is proposed to differentiate between variability that is a consequence of physical conformational heterogeneity and that which reflects uncertainty in the atomic coordinates.

Citing Articles

DNA conformational transitions inferred from re-evaluation of m|F| - D|F| electron-density maps.

Sunami T, Chatake T, Kono H Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2017; 73(Pt 7):600-608.

PMID: 28695860 PMC: 5505156. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798317007707.


E pluribus unum, no more: from one crystal, many conformations.

Woldeyes R, Sivak D, Fraser J Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2014; 28:56-62.

PMID: 25113271 PMC: 4253534. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.07.005.


Automated identification of functional dynamic contact networks from X-ray crystallography.

van den Bedem H, Bhabha G, Yang K, Wright P, Fraser J Nat Methods. 2013; 10(9):896-902.

PMID: 23913260 PMC: 3760795. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2592.


Significant reduction in errors associated with nonbonded contacts in protein crystal structures: automated all-atom refinement with PrimeX.

Bell J, Ho K, Farid R Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2012; 68(Pt 8):935-52.

PMID: 22868759 PMC: 3413210. DOI: 10.1107/S0907444912017453.


PDB ligand conformational energies calculated quantum-mechanically.

Sitzmann M, Weidlich I, Filippov I, Liao C, Peach M, Ihlenfeldt W J Chem Inf Model. 2012; 52(3):739-56.

PMID: 22303903 PMC: 7491702. DOI: 10.1021/ci200595n.


References
1.
Kleywegt G, Jones T . xdlMAPMAN and xdlDATAMAN - programs for reformatting, analysis and manipulation of biomacromolecular electron-density maps and reflection data sets. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1996; 52(Pt 4):826-8. DOI: 10.1107/S0907444995014983. View

2.
Furnham N, Blundell T, DePristo M, Terwilliger T . Is one solution good enough?. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006; 13(3):184-5. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb0306-184. View

3.
Berman H, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat T, Weissig H . The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999; 28(1):235-42. PMC: 102472. DOI: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235. View

4.
Gros P, van Gunsteren W, Hol W . Inclusion of thermal motion in crystallographic structures by restrained molecular dynamics. Science. 1990; 249(4973):1149-52. DOI: 10.1126/science.2396108. View

5.
Stec B, Zhou R, Teeter M . Full-matrix refinement of the protein crambin at 0.83 A and 130 K. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1995; 51(Pt 5):663-81. DOI: 10.1107/S0907444994014484. View