» Articles » PMID: 18385555

Ultra-low-dose MDCT of the Chest: Influence on Automated Lung Nodule Detection

Overview
Journal Korean J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2008 Apr 4
PMID 18385555
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the relationship between CT dose and the performance of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system, and to determine how best to minimize patient exposure to ionizing radiation while maintaining sufficient image quality for automated lung nodule detection, by the use of lung cancer screening CT.

Materials And Methods: Twenty-five asymptomatic volunteers participated in the study. Each volunteer underwent a low-dose CT scan without contrast enhancement (multidetector CT with 16 detector rows, 1.25 mm section thickness, 120 kVp, beam pitch 1.35, 0.6 second rotation time, with 1.25 mm thickness reconstruction at 1.25 mm intervals) using four different amperages 32, 16, 8, and 4 mAs. All series were analyzed using a commercially available CAD system for automatic lung nodule detection and the results were reviewed by a consensus reading by two radiologists. The McNemar test and Kappa analysis were used to compare differences in terms of the abilities to detect pulmonary nodules.

Results: A total of 78 non-calcified true nodules were visualized in the 25 study subjects. The sensitivities for nodule detection were as follows: 72% at 32 mAs, 64% at 16 mAs, 59% at 8 mAs, and 40% at 4 mAs. Although the overall nodule-detecting performance was best at 32 mAs, no significant difference in nodule detectability was observed between scans at 16 mAs or 8 mAs versus 32 mAs. However, scans performed at 4 mAs were significantly inferior to those performed at 32 mAs (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Reducing the radiation dose (i.e. reducing the amperage) lowers lung nodule detectability by CAD. However, relatively low dose scans were found to be acceptable and to cause no significant reduction in nodule detectability versus usual low-dose CT.

Citing Articles

Emphysema Quantification Using Ultra-Low-Dose Chest CT: Efficacy of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction.

Yeom J, Kim K, Hwang M, Lee J, Kim K, Song Y Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(7).

PMID: 35888658 PMC: 9317892. DOI: 10.3390/medicina58070939.


Respiratory surveillance for coal mine dust and artificial stone exposed workers in Australia and New Zealand: A position statement from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand.

Perret J, Miles S, Brims F, Newbigin K, Davidson M, Jersmann H Respirology. 2020; 25(11):1193-1202.

PMID: 33051927 PMC: 7702073. DOI: 10.1111/resp.13952.


A practical and adaptive approach to lung cancer screening: a review of international evidence and position on CT lung cancer screening in the Singaporean population by the College of Radiologists Singapore.

Liew C, Leong L, Teo L, Ong C, Cheah F, Tham W Singapore Med J. 2019; 60(11):554-559.

PMID: 31781779 PMC: 6875803. DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2019145.


Concomitant screening of coronary artery disease and lung cancer with a new ultrafast-low-dose Computed Tomography protocol: A pilot randomised trial.

Gaudio C, Tanzilli A, Mei M, Moretti A, Barilla F, Varveri A Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):13872.

PMID: 31554878 PMC: 6761135. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50407-6.


Automatic current selection with iterative reconstruction reduces effective dose to less than 1 mSv in low-dose chest computed tomography in persons with normal BMI.

Chen L, Wu P, Sheu M, Tu H, Huang L Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(28):e16350.

PMID: 31305425 PMC: 6641832. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016350.


References
1.
Rusinek H, Naidich D, McGuinness G, Leitman B, McCauley D, Krinsky G . Pulmonary nodule detection: low-dose versus conventional CT. Radiology. 1998; 209(1):243-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.209.1.9769838. View

2.
Awai K, Murao K, Ozawa A, Komi M, Hayakawa H, Hori S . Pulmonary nodules at chest CT: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists' detection performance. Radiology. 2004; 230(2):347-52. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2302030049. View

3.
Mayo J, Kim K, MacDonald S, Johkoh T, Kavanagh P, Coxson H . Reduced radiation dose helical chest CT: effect on reader evaluation of structures and lung findings. Radiology. 2004; 232(3):749-56. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2323030899. View

4.
Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H, Kakinuma R, NARUKE T, Suemasu K . Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. Radiology. 1996; 201(3):798-802. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939234. View

5.
Nitta N, Takahashi M, Murata K, Morita R . Ultra low-dose helical CT of the chest. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 171(2):383-5. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.171.2.9694456. View