» Articles » PMID: 18374296

FISH Mapping of De Novo Apparently Balanced Chromosome Rearrangements Identifies Characteristics Associated with Phenotypic Abnormality

Overview
Journal Am J Hum Genet
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Genetics
Date 2008 Apr 1
PMID 18374296
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We report fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) mapping of 152, mostly de novo, apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangement (ABCR) breakpoints in 76 individuals, 30 of whom had no obvious phenotypic abnormality (control group) and 46 of whom had an associated disease (case group). The aim of this study was to identify breakpoint characteristics that could discriminate between these groups and which might be of predictive value in de novo ABCR (DN-ABCR) cases detected antenatally. We found no difference in the proportion of breakpoints that interrupted a gene, although in three cases, direct interruption or deletion of known autosomal-dominant or X-linked recessive Mendelian disease genes was diagnostic. The only significant predictor of phenotypic abnormality in the group as a whole was the localization of one or both breakpoints to an R-positive (G-negative) band with estimated predictive values of 0.69 (95% CL 0.54-0.81) and 0.90 (95% CL 0.60-0.98), respectively. R-positive bands are known to contain more genes and have a higher guanine-cytosine (GC) content than do G-positive (R-negative) bands; however, whether a gene was interrupted by the breakpoint or the GC content in the 200 kB around the breakpoint had no discriminant ability. Our results suggest that the large-scale genomic context of the breakpoint has prognostic utility and that the pathological mechanism of mapping to an R-band cannot be accounted for by direct gene inactivation.

Citing Articles

Current Diagnostic Approaches in the Genetic Diagnosis of Disorders of Sex Development.

Kizilay D, Ozen S J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2024; 16(4):401-410.

PMID: 38683034 PMC: 11629718. DOI: 10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2024.2024-3-3.


Chromosomal Translocations Detection in Cancer Cells Using Chromosomal Conformation Capture Data.

Adeel M, Rehman K, Zhang Y, Arega Y, Li G Genes (Basel). 2022; 13(7).

PMID: 35885953 PMC: 9319866. DOI: 10.3390/genes13071170.


Dynamic expression of NR2F1 and SOX2 in developing and adult human cortex: comparison with cortical malformations.

Foglio B, Rossini L, Garbelli R, Regondi M, Mercurio S, Bertacchi M Brain Struct Funct. 2021; 226(4):1303-1322.

PMID: 33661352 DOI: 10.1007/s00429-021-02242-7.


Location of Balanced Chromosome-Translocation Breakpoints by Long-Read Sequencing on the Oxford Nanopore Platform.

Hu L, Liang F, Cheng D, Zhang Z, Yu G, Zha J Front Genet. 2020; 10:1313.

PMID: 32010185 PMC: 6972507. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01313.


Non-Random Distribution of Reciprocal Translocation Breakpoints in the Pig Genome.

Donaldson B, Villagomez D, Revay T, Rezaei S, King W Genes (Basel). 2019; 10(10).

PMID: 31575040 PMC: 6826608. DOI: 10.3390/genes10100769.


References
1.
Fiegler H, Carr P, Douglas E, Burford D, Hunt S, Scott C . DNA microarrays for comparative genomic hybridization based on DOP-PCR amplification of BAC and PAC clones. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2003; 36(4):361-74. DOI: 10.1002/gcc.10155. View

2.
Nishimura D, Swiderski R, Alward W, Searby C, Patil S, Bennet S . The forkhead transcription factor gene FKHL7 is responsible for glaucoma phenotypes which map to 6p25. Nat Genet. 1998; 19(2):140-7. DOI: 10.1038/493. View

3.
Warburton D . De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. Am J Hum Genet. 1991; 49(5):995-1013. PMC: 1683246. View

4.
Ray P, Belfall B, Duff C, Logan C, Kean V, Thompson M . Cloning of the breakpoint of an X;21 translocation associated with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nature. 1985; 318(6047):672-5. DOI: 10.1038/318672a0. View

5.
NAKAGOME Y, Matsubara T, Fujita H . Distribution of break points in human structural rearrangements. Am J Hum Genet. 1983; 35(2):288-300. PMC: 1685530. View