Impact of Computerized Decision Support on Blood Pressure Management and Control: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

Journal J Gen Intern Med

Publisher Springer

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2008 Apr 1

PMID 18373141

Citations 54

Authors

LeRoi S Hicks

Thomas D Sequist

John Z Ayanian

Shimon Shaykevich

David G Fairchild

E John Orav

David W Bates

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to examine the effectiveness of computerized decision support (CDS) designed to improve hypertension care and outcomes in a racially diverse sample of primary care patients.

Methods: We randomized 2,027 adult patients receiving hypertension care in 14 primary care practices to either 18 months of their physicians receiving CDS for each hypertensive patient or to usual care without computerized support for the control group. We assessed prescribing of guideline-recommended drug therapy and levels of blood pressure control for patients in each group and examined if the effects of the intervention differed by patients' race/ethnicity using interaction terms.

Measurements And Main Results: Rates of blood pressure control were 42% at baseline and 46% at the outcome visit with no significant differences between groups. After adjustment for patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, number of prior visits, and levels of baseline blood pressure control, there were no differences between intervention groups in the odds of outcome blood pressure control. The use of CDS to providers significantly improved Joint National Committee (JNC) guideline adherent medication prescribing compared to usual care (7% versus 5%, P < 0.001); the effects of the intervention remained after multivariable adjustment (odds ratio [OR] 1.39 [CI, 1.13-1.72]) and the effects of the intervention did not differ by patients' race and ethnicity.

Conclusions: CDS improved appropriate medication prescribing with no improvement in disparities in care and overall blood pressure control. Future work focusing on improvement of these interventions and the study of other practical interventions to reduce disparities in hypertension-related outcomes is needed.

Citing Articles

Learning implementation of a guideline based decision support system to improve hypertension treatment in primary care in China: pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.

Song J, Wang X, Wang B, Ge Y, Bi L, Jing F BMJ. 2024; 386:e079143.

PMID: 39043397 PMC: 11265211. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-079143.

Role of Health Care Professionals in the Success of Blood Pressure Control Interventions in Patients With Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis.

Mills K, OConnell S, Pan M, Obst K, He H, He J Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024; 17(8):e010396.

PMID: 39027934 PMC: 11338746. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010396.

Study protocol: Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High blood pressure (COACH) in adults - a randomised controlled trial.

Dorr D, Montgomery E, Ghumman A, Michaels L, Rolbiecki A, Canfield S BMJ Open. 2024; 14(7):e085898.

PMID: 38977368 PMC: 11256044. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085898.

PillHarmonics: An Orchestrated Pharmacogenetics Medication Clinical Decision Support Service.

Dolin R, Shenvi E, Alvarez C, Barrows Jr R, Boxwala A, Lee B Appl Clin Inform. 2024; 15(2):378-387.

PMID: 38388174 PMC: 11098593. DOI: 10.1055/a-2274-6763.

Optimization of GDMT for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: can physiological and biological barriers explain the gaps in adherence to heart failure guidelines?.

Jarjour M, Ducharme A Drugs Context. 2023; 12.

PMID: 38021409 PMC: 10664772. DOI: 10.7573/dic.2023-5-6.

References

Gerber J, Stewart D . Prevention and control of hypertension and diabetes in an underserved population through community outreach and disease management: a plan of action. J Assoc Acad Minor Phys. 1998; 9(3):48-52. View

Tunis S, Stryer D, Clancy C . Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA. 2003; 290(12):1624-32. DOI: 10.1001/jama.290.12.1624. View

Sundquist J, Winkleby M, Pudaric S . Cardiovascular disease risk factors among older black, Mexican-American, and white women and men: an analysis of NHANES III, 1988-1994. Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001; 49(2):109-16. DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49030.x. View

Hicks L, Shaykevich S, Bates D, Ayanian J . Determinants of racial/ethnic differences in blood pressure management among hypertensive patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005; 5(1):16. PMC: 1173097. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-5-16. View

Wong M, Shapiro M, Boscardin W, Ettner S . Contribution of major diseases to disparities in mortality. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(20):1585-92. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa012979. View

Hicks L, Fairchild D, Horng M, Orav E, Bates D, Ayanian J . Determinants of JNC VI guideline adherence, intensity of drug therapy, and blood pressure control by race and ethnicity. Hypertension. 2004; 44(4):429-34. DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000141439.34834.84. View

He J, Klag M, Caballero B, Appel L, Charleston J, Whelton P . Plasma insulin levels and incidence of hypertension in African Americans and whites. Arch Intern Med. 1999; 159(5):498-503. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.159.5.498. View

Luck J, Peabody J, Dresselhaus T, Lee M, Glassman P . How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record. Am J Med. 2000; 108(8):642-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00363-6. View

Forrest C, Whelan E . Primary care safety-net delivery sites in the United States: A comparison of community health centers, hospital outpatient departments, and physicians' offices. JAMA. 2000; 284(16):2077-83. DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.16.2077. View

10.

Berlowitz D, Ash A, HICKEY E, Friedman R, Glickman M, Kader B . Inadequate management of blood pressure in a hypertensive population. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339(27):1957-63. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199812313392701. View

11.

Richardson A, Piepho R . Effect of race on hypertension and antihypertensive therapy. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000; 38(2):75-9. DOI: 10.5414/cpp38075. View

12.

Tierney W, Overhage J, Murray M, Harris L, Zhou X, Eckert G . Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2003; 18(12):967-76. PMC: 1494965. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.30635.x. View

13.

Hyman D, Pavlik V . Uncontrolled hypertension as a risk for coronary artery disease: patient characteristics and the role of physician intervention. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2003; 5(2):131-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11883-003-0085-z. View

14.

Nilasena D, Lincoln M . A computer-generated reminder system improves physician compliance with diabetes preventive care guidelines. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995; :640-5. PMC: 2579172. View

15.

Cooper L, Hill M, Powe N . Designing and evaluating interventions to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in health care. J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17(6):477-86. PMC: 1495065. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10633.x. View

16.

Hajjar I, Kotchen T . Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988-2000. JAMA. 2003; 290(2):199-206. DOI: 10.1001/jama.290.2.199. View

17.

Groman R, Ginsburg J . Racial and ethnic disparities in health care: a position paper of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141(3):226-32. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-3-200408030-00015. View

18.

Hyman D, Pavlik V . Characteristics of patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345(7):479-86. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa010273. View

19.

Oliveria S, Lapuerta P, McCarthy B, LItalien G, Berlowitz D, Asch S . Physician-related barriers to the effective management of uncontrolled hypertension. Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162(4):413-20. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.162.4.413. View

20.

Shea S, DuMouchel W, BAHAMONDE L . A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996; 3(6):399-409. PMC: 116324. DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1996.97084513. View