» Articles » PMID: 18372415

Reproducibility, Interrater Agreement, and Age-related Changes of Fractional Anisotropy Measures at 3T in Healthy Subjects: Effect of the Applied B-value

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2008 Mar 29
PMID 18372415
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: There is no reproducibility study of fractional anisotropy (FA) measurements at 3T using regions of interest (ROIs). Our purpose was to establish the extent and statistical significance of the interrater variability, the variability observed with 2 different b-values, and in 2 separate scanning sessions.

Materials And Methods: Twelve healthy volunteers underwent MR imaging twice. MR imaging was performed on a 3T unit, and FA maps were analyzed independently by 2 observers using ROIs positioned in the corpus callosum, internal capsules, corticospinal tracts, and right thalamus. Changes in FA values (x10(3)) measured with 2 b-values (700 and 1000 s/mm(2)), age-related differences, interobserver agreement, and measurement reproducibility were assessed.

Results: In the right internal capsule genu (FA = 702/728; b = 1000/700 s/mm(2)) and the left anterior limb of the internal capsule (AIC; FA = 617/745; b = 1000/700 s/mm(2)), the FA values were significantly different between the 2 b-values (P = .02 and .05, respectively). Significant age-related differences in FA were observed in the genu of the corpus callosum and in the left AIC. Interrater measurements showed fair-to-moderate agreement for most anatomic structures. The lowest significant change for a single subject regarding any FA values between the 2 sessions was in the corpus callosum (4%), whereas the highest one was in the corticospinal tracts (27%). The Bland-Altman plot analysis showed that the 1000-s/mm(2) b-value gave satisfactorily reproducible measurements equally good or better than the 700-s/mm(2) b-value.

Conclusion: The reproducibility of FA estimates using ROIs was satisfactory. Measurements with a b-value at 1000 s/mm(2) showed superior reproducibility in most anatomic locations.

Citing Articles

Decoding Brain Development and Aging: Pioneering Insights From MRI Techniques.

Hagiwara A, Kamio S, Kikuta J, Nakaya M, Uchida W, Fujita S Invest Radiol. 2024; 60(3):162-174.

PMID: 39724579 PMC: 11801466. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000001120.


Direct jet coaxial electrospinning of axon-mimicking fibers for diffusion tensor imaging.

Hu C, Grech-Sollars M, Statton B, Li Z, Gao F, Williams G Polym Adv Technol. 2024; 34(8):2573-2584.

PMID: 38505514 PMC: 10946859. DOI: 10.1002/pat.6073.


Both noise-floor and tissue compartment difference in diffusivity contribute to FA dependence on b-value in diffusion MRI.

Yao J, Tendler B, Zhou Z, Lei H, Zhang L, Bao A Hum Brain Mapp. 2022; 44(4):1371-1388.

PMID: 36264194 PMC: 9921221. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26121.


Development of a composite diffusion tensor imaging score correlating with short-term neurological status in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

Onda K, Catenaccio E, Chotiyanonta J, Chavez-Valdez R, Meoded A, Soares B Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:931360.

PMID: 35983227 PMC: 9379310. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.931360.


Disorders of Consciousness Associated With COVID-19: A Prospective Multimodal Study of Recovery and Brain Connectivity.

Fischer D, Snider S, Barra M, Sanders W, Rapalino O, Schaefer P Neurology. 2021; 98(3):e315-e325.

PMID: 34862317 PMC: 8792809. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013067.


References
1.
Jansen J, Kooi M, Kessels A, Nicolay K, Backes W . Reproducibility of quantitative cerebral T2 relaxometry, diffusion tensor imaging, and 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3.0 Tesla. Invest Radiol. 2007; 42(6):327-37. DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000262757.10271.e5. View

2.
Miller J, McKinstry R, Philip J, Mukherjee P, Neil J . Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of normal brain maturation: a guide to structural development and myelination. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 180(3):851-9. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.180.3.1800851. View

3.
Gulani V, Sundgren P . Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. J Neuroophthalmol. 2006; 26(1):51-60. DOI: 10.1097/01.wno.0000205978.86281.3e. View

4.
Heim S, Hahn K, Samann P, Fahrmeir L, Auer D . Assessing DTI data quality using bootstrap analysis. Magn Reson Med. 2004; 52(3):582-9. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20169. View

5.
Basser P, Pierpaoli C . Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson B. 1996; 111(3):209-19. DOI: 10.1006/jmrb.1996.0086. View