» Articles » PMID: 18367675

Expression of the Gene for Mouse Lactate Dehydrogenase C (Ldhc) is Required for Male Fertility

Overview
Journal Biol Reprod
Date 2008 Mar 28
PMID 18367675
Citations 90
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) protein family members characteristically are distributed in tissue- and cell type-specific patterns and serve as the terminal enzyme of glycolysis, catalyzing reversible oxidation reduction between pyruvate and lactate. They are present as tetramers, and one family member, LDHC, is abundant in spermatocytes, spermatids, and sperm, but also is found in modest amounts in oocytes. We disrupted the Ldhc gene to determine whether LDHC is required for spermatogenesis, oogenesis, and/or sperm and egg function. The targeted disruption of Ldhc severely impaired fertility in male Ldhc(-/-) mice but not in female Ldhc(-/-) mice. Testis and sperm morphology and sperm production appeared to be normal. However, total LDH enzymatic activity was considerably lower in Ldhc(-/-) sperm than in wild type sperm, indicating that the LDHC homotetramer (LDH-C(4)) is responsible for most of the LDH activity in sperm. Although initially motile when isolated, there was a more rapid reduction in the level of ATP and in motility in Ldhc(-)(/-) sperm than in wild-type sperm. Moreover, Ldhc(-/-) sperm did not acquire hyperactivated motility, were unable to penetrate the zona pellucida in vitro, and failed to undergo the phosphorylation events characteristic of capacitation. These studies showed that LDHC plays an essential role in maintenance of the processes of glycolysis and ATP production in the flagellum that are required for male fertility and sperm function.

Citing Articles

Altered Sertoli Cell Function Contributes to Spermatogenic Arrest in Dogs with Chronic Asymptomatic Orchitis.

Rehder P, Packeiser E, Korber H, Goericke-Pesch S Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(3).

PMID: 39940876 PMC: 11817828. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26031108.


Proteomic analysis for busulfan-induced spermatogenesis disorder.

Hu K, Zhu Q, Zou J, Li X, Ye M, Yang J Ann Med. 2024; 57(1):2442534.

PMID: 39697060 PMC: 11660421. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2442534.


Spermatogenic cell-specific type 1 hexokinase (HK1S) is essential for capacitation-associated increase in tyrosine phosphorylation and male fertility in mice.

Tian Y, Chen X, Pu J, Liang Y, Li W, Xu X PLoS Genet. 2024; 20(7):e1011357.

PMID: 39074078 PMC: 11285943. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011357.


Cytosolic and Acrosomal pH Regulation in Mammalian Sperm.

Chavez J, Carrasquel-Martinez G, Hernandez-Garduno S, Matamoros Volante A, Trevino C, Nishigaki T Cells. 2024; 13(10.

PMID: 38786087 PMC: 11120249. DOI: 10.3390/cells13100865.


CCDC28A deficiency causes sperm head defects, reduced sperm motility and male infertility in mice.

Zhou H, Zhang Z, Qu R, Zhu H, Luo Y, Li Q Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024; 81(1):174.

PMID: 38597936 PMC: 11006775. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-024-05184-5.


References
1.
Jutte N, Jansen R, Grootegoed J, Rommerts F, Clausen O, VAN DER MOLEN H . Regulation of survival of rat pachytene spermatocytes by lactate supply from Sertoli cells. J Reprod Fertil. 1982; 65(2):431-8. DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0650431. View

2.
Wheat T, Goldberg E . An allelic variant of the sperm-specific lactate dehydrogenase C4 (LDH-X) isozyme in humans. J Exp Zool. 1977; 202(3):425-30. DOI: 10.1002/jez.1402020312. View

3.
Mukai C, Okuno M . Glycolysis plays a major role for adenosine triphosphate supplementation in mouse sperm flagellar movement. Biol Reprod. 2004; 71(2):540-7. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.026054. View

4.
Sleight S, Miranda P, Plaskett N, Maier B, Lysiak J, Scrable H . Isolation and proteomic analysis of mouse sperm detergent-resistant membrane fractions: evidence for dissociation of lipid rafts during capacitation. Biol Reprod. 2005; 73(4):721-9. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.105.041533. View

5.
Travis A, Tutuncu L, Jorgez C, Ord T, Jones B, Kopf G . Requirements for glucose beyond sperm capacitation during in vitro fertilization in the mouse. Biol Reprod. 2004; 71(1):139-45. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.025809. View