» Articles » PMID: 18367500

Cumulative Funnel Plots for the Early Detection of Interoperator Variation: Retrospective Database Analysis of Observed Versus Predicted Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2008 Mar 28
PMID 18367500
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To use funnel plots and cumulative funnel plots to compare in-hospital outcome data for operators undertaking percutaneous coronary interventions with predicted results derived from a validated risk score to allow for early detection of variation in performance.

Design: Analysis of prospectively collected data.

Setting: Tertiary centre NHS hospital in the north east of England.

Participants: Five cardiologists carrying out percutaneous coronary interventions between January 2003 and December 2006.

Main Outcome Measures: In-hospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (in-hospital death, Q wave myocardial infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and cerebrovascular accident) analysed against the logistic north west quality improvement programme predicted risk, for each operator. Results are displayed as funnel plots summarising overall performance for each operator and cumulative funnel plots for an individual operator's performance on a case series basis.

Results: The funnel plots for 5198 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions showed an average observed rate for major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events of 1.96% overall. This was below the predicted risk of 2.06% by the logistic north west quality improvement programme risk score. Rates of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events for all operators were within the 3sigma upper control limit of 2.75% and 2sigma upper warning limit of 2.49%.

Conclusion: The overall in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events rates were under the predicted event rate. In-hospital rates after percutaneous coronary intervention procedure can be monitored successfully using funnel and cumulative funnel plots with 3sigma control limits to display and publish each operator's outcomes. The upper warning limit (2sigma control limit) could be used for internal monitoring. The main advantage of these charts is their transparency, as they show observed and predicted events separately. By this approach individual operators can monitor their own performance, using the predicted risk for their patients but in a way that is compatible with benchmarking to colleagues, encapsulated by the funnel plot. This methodology is applicable regardless of variations in individual operator case volume and case mix.

Citing Articles

Benchmarking survival outcomes: A funnel plot for survival data.

Putter H, Eikema D, de Wreede L, McGrath E, Sanchez-Ortega I, Saccardi R Stat Methods Med Res. 2022; 31(6):1171-1183.

PMID: 35257603 PMC: 9245152. DOI: 10.1177/09622802221084130.


Impact of guideline-recommended dietitian assessments on weight gain in infants with cystic fibrosis.

Ong T, Onchiri F, Britto M, Heltshe S, Kessler L, Seid M J Cyst Fibros. 2021; 21(1):115-122.

PMID: 34454845 PMC: 8844148. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2021.08.005.


Application of Variable Life Adjusted Displays (VLAD) on Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset (VAED).

Andrianopoulos N, Jolley D, Evans S, Brand C, Cameron P BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12:278.

PMID: 22925089 PMC: 3576249. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-278.


Severe head injury in children: intensive care unit activity and mortality in England and Wales.

Tasker R, Fleming T, Young A, Morris K, Parslow R Br J Neurosurg. 2010; 25(1):68-77.

PMID: 21083365 PMC: 3038595. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2010.538770.


Doomed to repeat the successes of the past: history is best forgotten for repeated choices with nonstationary payoffs.

Rakow T, Miler K Mem Cognit. 2009; 37(7):985-1000.

PMID: 19744938 DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.7.985.


References
1.
WILLIAMS D, Holubkov R, Yeh W, Bourassa M, Block P, Coady P . Percutaneous coronary intervention in the current era compared with 1985-1986: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Registries. Circulation. 2000; 102(24):2945-51. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.24.2945. View

2.
Bridgewater B . Mortality data in adult cardiac surgery for named surgeons: retrospective examination of prospectively collected data on coronary artery surgery and aortic valve replacement. BMJ. 2005; 330(7490):506-10. PMC: 552809. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.330.7490.506. View

3.
Kunadian B, Dunning J, Das R, Roberts A, Morley R, Turley A . External validation of established risk adjustment models for procedural complications after percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart. 2007; 94(8):1012-8. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2007.129197. View

4.
Detre K, Yeh W, Kelsey S, Williams D, Desvigne-Nickens P, Holmes Jr D . Has improvement in PTCA intervention affected long-term prognosis? The NHLBI PTCA Registry experience. Circulation. 1995; 91(12):2868-75. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.91.12.2868. View

5.
Bridgewater B, Grayson A, Jackson M, Brooks N, Grotte G, Keenan D . Surgeon specific mortality in adult cardiac surgery: comparison between crude and risk stratified data. BMJ. 2003; 327(7405):13-7. PMC: 164230. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7405.13. View