Modelling of Phosphorus Inputs to Rivers from Diffuse and Point Sources
Overview
Affiliations
The difference in timing of point and diffuse phosphorus (P) delivery to a river produces clear differences in the P concentration-flow relationship. Point inputs decrease in concentration with increasing river flow, due to dilution of a relatively constant input, whereas diffuse (non-point) load usually increases with river flow. This study developed a simple model, based on this fundamental difference, which allowed point and diffuse inputs to be quantified by modelling their contribution to river P concentration as a power-law function of flow. The relationships between total phosphorus (TP) concentration and river flow were investigated for three contrasting UK river catchments; the Swale (Yorkshire), the Frome (Dorset) and the Avon (Warwickshire). A load apportionment model was fitted to this empirical data to give estimates of point and diffuse load inputs at each monitoring site, at high temporal resolution. The model produced TP source apportionments that were similar to those derived from an export coefficient approach. For many diffuse-dominated sites within this study (with up to 75% of the annual TP load derived from diffuse sources), the model showed that reductions of point inputs would be most effective in order to reduce eutrophication risk, due to point source dominance during the plant and algae growing period. This modelling approach should provide simple, robust and rapid TP source apportionment from most concentration-flow datasets. It does not require GIS, information on land use, catchment size, population or livestock density, and could provide a valuable and versatile tool to catchment managers for determining suitable river mitigation options.
Oates C, Fajardo H, Grieger K, Obenour D, Muenich R, Nelson N ACS Environ Au. 2025; 5(1):1-11.
PMID: 39830715 PMC: 11740920. DOI: 10.1021/acsenvironau.4c00060.
Improving estimates of phosphorus loads using hierarchical models.
Yuan L J Hydrol (Amst). 2023; 614:1-8.
PMID: 37614977 PMC: 10442720. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128558.
Song J, Her Y, Guo T Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):9216.
PMID: 35654952 PMC: 9163129. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12740-1.
Sharma V, Joshi H, Bowes M Water Air Soil Pollut. 2021; 232(5):212.
PMID: 33994598 PMC: 8107415. DOI: 10.1007/s11270-021-05152-w.
Nutrient pollutant loading and source apportionment along a Mediterranean river.
El-Nakib S, Alameddine I, Massoud M, Abou Najm M Environ Monit Assess. 2020; 192(5):274.
PMID: 32266479 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-020-8220-7.