» Articles » PMID: 18355146

Urinary and Sexual Function Outcomes Among Different Age Groups After Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

Overview
Journal J Endourol
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Date 2008 Mar 22
PMID 18355146
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We present an age-stratified prospective assessment of urinary and sexual function of 300 patients after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).

Materials And Methods: Subjective assessment data of continence and potency were collected for different age groups (<50, 50-59, and > or =60 years old) preoperatively, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after RALP. Health-related quality of life questionnaires evaluated return of baseline urinary and sexual function at the same time intervals.

Results: The three age groups included 21, 129, and 150 patients (aged <50, 50-59, and >60 years old, respectively). Using Kaplan-Meier curves, younger men achieved subjective continence significantly earlier than older age groups when age groups were compared using a 60-year-old cut-off point (P = 0.02). However, subjective continence was noted to be equal among all age groups after 1 year of follow-up. Time to recovery of subjective potency among age groups shows a significant difference in favor of the younger age group (P = 0.01) Objective urinary function is equal between age groups at all time points, while objective sexual function assessment showed a trend toward better results in the younger age group.

Conclusions: Younger men will likely have an earlier return of continence and potency compared to older men after RALP. However, continence outcomes were noted to be equal among age groups after I year of follow-up, while younger men continue to report superior potency outcomes compared to older men over the first postoperative year. Such findings are valuable in counseling older men undergoing this procedure.

Citing Articles

Urinary incontinence rehabilitation of after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Yu K, Bu F, Jian T, Liu Z, Hu R, Chen S Front Oncol. 2024; 13:1307434.

PMID: 38584666 PMC: 10996052. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1307434.


Prediction of Incontinence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Development and Validation of a 24-Month Incontinence Nomogram.

Pinkhasov R, Lee T, Huang R, Berkley B, Pinkhasov A, Dodge N Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(7).

PMID: 35406416 PMC: 8997126. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071644.


Focusing on sexual rehabilitation besides penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy is important.

Vanderhaeghe D, Albersen M, Weyne E Int J Impot Res. 2021; 33(4):448-456.

PMID: 33753906 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-021-00420-z.


How to Prevent and Manage Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Review.

Schifano N, Capogrosso P, Tutolo M, Deho F, Montorsi F, Salonia A World J Mens Health. 2020; 39(4):581-597.

PMID: 33151045 PMC: 8443978. DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.200114.


Oncological and functional outcomes in patients over 70 years of age treated with robotic radical prostatectomy: a propensity-matched analysis.

Gurung P, Wang B, Hassig S, Wood J, Ellis E, Feng C World J Urol. 2020; 39(4):1131-1140.

PMID: 32537666 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03304-x.