» Articles » PMID: 18341776

A Comparative Case Study on Active Transport to and from School

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2008 Mar 18
PMID 18341776
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: This study investigates active-transport-to-school initiatives through the Active Living by Design Community Action Model framework. The framework outlines five strategies that influence physical activity: preparation, promotion, programs, policies, and physical projects.

Methods: A comparative case study was conducted to investigate active-transport-to-school initiatives at two North Carolina schools. A group of key stakeholders from each site was interviewed (N = 16), including principals, physical education teachers, public safety officers, city planners, regional transportation planners, city council members, and parent representatives. Content analysis was carried out using NVivo software, and data were evaluated using the framework.

Results: Applications designed around all five strategies positively influenced active-transport-to-school programs. Both schools used similar strategies including promotional tactics, policies, and physical projects; however, only one used all five strategies. The scope and duration of these strategies varied by school and ultimately seemed to influence their success. Enablers and challenges to active-transport-to-school programs were identified, including funding, school location, available infrastructure, community involvement, school support, parental buy-in, and sufficient program promotion.

Conclusion: The quality of the strategies, not their mere presence or use, proved important in active-transport-to-school programs. These results suggest that a multidisciplinary approach that develops promotional materials, resources, school support, and environmental changes to sustain factors that influence parental buy-in will prove critical to the success of future walk-to-school initiatives.

Citing Articles

Examining the impact of the walking school bus with an agent-based model.

Yang Y, Diez-Roux A, Evenson K, Colabianchi N Am J Public Health. 2014; 104(7):1196-203.

PMID: 24832410 PMC: 4056201. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301896.


Exploring a public health perspective on pedestrian planning.

Evenson K, Satinsky S, Rodriguez D, Aytur S Health Promot Pract. 2011; 13(2):204-13.

PMID: 21677117 PMC: 4966667. DOI: 10.1177/1524839910381699.


A systematic review of interventions for promoting active transportation to school.

Chillon P, Evenson K, Vaughn A, Ward D Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8:10.

PMID: 21320322 PMC: 3050785. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-10.


What's "quickest and easiest?": parental decision making about school trip mode.

Faulkner G, Richichi V, Buliung R, Fusco C, Moola F Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7:62.

PMID: 20691063 PMC: 2924842. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-62.

References
1.
. Recommendations to increase physical activity in communities. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 22(4 Suppl):67-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00433-6. View

2.
Braza M, Shoemaker W, Seeley A . Neighborhood design and rates of walking and biking to elementary school in 34 California communities. Am J Health Promot. 2004; 19(2):128-36. DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-19.2.128. View

3.
Hedley A, Ogden C, Johnson C, Carroll M, Curtin L, Flegal K . Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999-2002. JAMA. 2004; 291(23):2847-50. DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.23.2847. View

4.
Fulton J, Shisler J, Yore M, Caspersen C . Active transportation to school: findings from a national survey. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2005; 76(3):352-7. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2005.10599306. View

5.
Kerr J, Rosenberg D, Sallis J, Saelens B, Frank L, Conway T . Active commuting to school: Associations with environment and parental concerns. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38(4):787-94. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000210208.63565.73. View