Preoperative Valsalva Leak Point Pressure May Not Predict Outcome of Mid-urethral Slings. Analysis from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Retropubic Versus Transobturator Mid-urethral Slings
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To test the hypothesis that preoperative Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) predicts long-term outcome of mid-urethra slings for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Materials And Methods: One hundred and forty-five patients with SUI were prospectively randomized to two mid-urethra sling treatments: Tension free vaginal tape (TVT) or transobturator tape (TOT). They were followed-up at 3, 6, 12 months post-operatively and then annually for the primary outcome variable, i.e. dry or wet and secondary outcome variables such as scores on the urogenital distress inventory (UDI-6) and the impact of incontinence on quality of life (IIQ-7) questionnaire as well as patient satisfaction as scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Preoperative VLPP was correlated with primary and secondary outcome variables.
Results: Mean follow-ups were 32 +/- 12 months (range 12-55) for TVT and 31 +/- 15 months (range 12-61) for TOT. When patients were analyzed according to VLPP stratification, 95 (65.5%) patients showed a VLPP > 60 cm H2O and 50 (34.5%) patients had a VLPP < or = 60 cm H2O. The overall objective cure rates were 75.8% for patients with VLPP > 60 cm H2O and 72% for those with VLPP < or = 60 cm H2O (p < 0.619). No significant differences in objective cure rates emerged when patients were stratified for pre-operative VLPP and matched for TOT or TVT procedures: VLPP > 60 cm H2O (82% vs. 68.9% p < 0.172); VLPP < or = 60 cm H2O (68% vs. 76% p < 0.528).
Conclusions: When patients were stratified for preoperative VLPP (< or = or > of 60 cm H2O), preoperative VLPP was not linked to outcome after TVT or TOT procedures.
Kwon J, Suzuki T, Takaoka E, Shimizu N, Shimizu T, Takai S Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2019; 317(4):F781-F788.
PMID: 31313954 PMC: 6843045. DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00197.2019.
Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.
Ford A, Rogerson L, Cody J, Aluko P, Ogah J Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 7:CD006375.
PMID: 28756647 PMC: 6483329. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4.
Kim H, Park H, Paick S, Choi W PLoS One. 2016; 11(5):e0156306.
PMID: 27228092 PMC: 4882043. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156306.
Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.
Blaivas J, Purohit R, Benedon M, Mekel G, Stern M, Billah M Nat Rev Urol. 2015; 12(9):481-509.
PMID: 26282209 DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.183.
Costantini E, Kocjancic E, Lazzeri M, Giannantoni A, Zucchi A, Carbone A World J Urol. 2015; 34(4):585-93.
PMID: 26231286 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1651-z.