Minimally Interrupted Cardiac Resuscitation by Emergency Medical Services for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Context: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a major public health problem.
Objective: To investigate whether the survival of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest would improve with minimally interrupted cardiac resuscitation (MICR), an alternate emergency medical services (EMS) protocol.
Design, Setting, And Patients: A prospective study of survival-to-hospital discharge between January 1, 2005, and November 22, 2007. Patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in 2 metropolitan cities in Arizona before and after MICR training of fire department emergency medical personnel were assessed. In a second analysis of protocol compliance, patients from the 2 metropolitan cities and 60 additional fire departments in Arizona who actually received MICR were compared with patients who did not receive MICR but received standard advanced life support.
Intervention: Instruction for EMS personnel in MICR, an approach that includes an initial series of 200 uninterrupted chest compressions, rhythm analysis with a single shock, 200 immediate postshock chest compressions before pulse check or rhythm reanalysis, early administration of epinephrine, and delayed endotracheal intubation.
Main Outcome Measure: Survival-to-hospital discharge.
Results: Among the 886 patients in the 2 metropolitan cities, survival-to-hospital discharge increased from 1.8% (4/218) before MICR training to 5.4% (36/668) after MICR training (odds ratio [OR], 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-8.9). In the subgroup of 174 patients with witnessed cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation, survival increased from 4.7% (2/43) before MICR training to 17.6% (23/131) after MICR training (OR, 8.6; 95% CI, 1.8-42.0). In the analysis of MICR protocol compliance involving 2460 patients with cardiac arrest, survival was significantly better among patients who received MICR than those who did not (9.1% [60/661] vs 3.8% [69/1799]; OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.9-4.1), as well as patients with witnessed ventricular fibrillation (28.4% [40/141] vs 11.9% [46/387]; OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.0-5.8).
Conclusions: Survival-to-hospital discharge of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest increased after implementation of MICR as an alternate EMS protocol. These results need to be confirmed in a randomized trial.
Baljoon J, Jamjoom J, Alolasi K, Tabbakh B, Badawi A, Almazmumi M Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e78236.
PMID: 39897304 PMC: 11785455. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78236.
Kim D, Yu J, Kim M, Tak Lee G, Shin S, Hwang S Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3245.
PMID: 39863761 PMC: 11762299. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87757-3.
Abu Fraiha Y, Shafat T, Codish S, Frenkel A, Dolfin D, Dreiher J PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0309376.
PMID: 39302946 PMC: 11414910. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309376.
Takei Y, Toyama G, Takahashi T, Omatsu K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):6071.
PMID: 38480805 PMC: 10937976. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56487-3.
Olasveengen T, Skare C, Skjerven-Martinsen M, Hoff-Olsen P, Kramer-Johansen J, Hoff Nordum F Resusc Plus. 2023; 17:100530.
PMID: 38155976 PMC: 10753078. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100530.