» Articles » PMID: 18330701

Comparison and Analysis of Inter-subject Variability of Simulated Magnetic Activity Generated from Gastric Electrical Activity

Overview
Journal Ann Biomed Eng
Date 2008 Mar 12
PMID 18330701
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electrogastrograms (EGGs) produced from gastric electrical activity (GEA) are used as a non-invasive method to aid in the assessment of a subject's gastric condition. It has been documented that recordings of the magnetic activity generated from GEA are more reliable. Typically, with magnetic measurements of GEA, only activity perpendicular to the body is recorded. Also, external anatomical landmarks are used to position the magnetic recording devices, SQUIDs, (Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices) over the stomach with no allowance made for body habitus. In the work presented here, GEA and its corresponding magnetic activity are simulated. Using these data, we investigate the effects of using a standard SQUID location as well as a customized SQUID position and the contribution the magnetic component perpendicular to the body makes to the magnetic field. We also explore the effects of the stomach wall thickness on the resultant magnetic fields. The simulated results show that the thicker the wall, the larger the magnitude of the magnetic field holding the same signal patterns. We conclude that most of the magnetic activity arising from GEA occurs in a plane parallel to the anterior body. We also conclude that using a standard SQUID position can be suboptimal.

Citing Articles

Stomach Geometry Reconstruction Using Serosal Transmitting Coils and Magnetic Source Localization.

Drake C, Cheng L, Paskaranandavadivel N, Alighaleh S, Angeli-Gordon T, Du P IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022; 70(3):1036-1044.

PMID: 36121949 PMC: 10069741. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2022.3207770.


Characterizing Spatial Signatures of Gastric Electrical Activity Using Biomagnetic Source Localization.

Avci R, Eichler C, Paskaranandavadivel N, Du P, Angeli-Gordon T, Bradshaw L IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022; 69(11):3551-3558.

PMID: 35560086 PMC: 9629986. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2022.3174847.


Patterns of Abnormal Gastric Pacemaking After Sleeve Gastrectomy Defined by Laparoscopic High-Resolution Electrical Mapping.

Berry R, Cheng L, Du P, Paskaranandavadivel N, Angeli T, Mayne T Obes Surg. 2017; 27(8):1929-1937.

PMID: 28213666 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-017-2597-6.


Multiscale modeling methods in biomechanics.

Bhattacharya P, Viceconti M Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2017; 9(3).

PMID: 28102563 PMC: 5412936. DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1375.


The virtual intestine: in silico modeling of small intestinal electrophysiology and motility and the applications.

Du P, Paskaranandavadivel N, Angeli T, Cheng L, OGrady G Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2015; 8(1):69-85.

PMID: 26562482 PMC: 5097873. DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1324.


References
1.
Aliev R, Richards W, Wikswo J . A simple nonlinear model of electrical activity in the intestine. J Theor Biol. 2000; 204(1):21-8. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.1069. View

2.
Chen J, McCallum R . Electrogastrography: measurement, analysis and prospective applications. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1991; 29(4):339-50. DOI: 10.1007/BF02441653. View

3.
Huh C, Bhutani M, Farfan E, Bolch W . Individual variations in mucosa and total wall thickness in the stomach and rectum assessed via endoscopic ultrasound. Physiol Meas. 2003; 24(4):N15-22. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/24/4/401. View

4.
Cheng L, Komuro R, Austin T, Buist M, Pullan A . Anatomically realistic multiscale models of normal and abnormal gastrointestinal electrical activity. World J Gastroenterol. 2007; 13(9):1378-83. PMC: 4146922. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i9.1378. View

5.
Bradshaw L, Irimia A, Sims J, Gallucci M, Palmer R, Richards W . Biomagnetic characterization of spatiotemporal parameters of the gastric slow wave. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006; 18(8):619-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2006.00794.x. View