Nectar Intake Rate is Modulated by Changes in Sucking Pump Activity According to Colony Starvation in Carpenter Ants

Overview

Journal J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol

Publisher Springer

Specialties Neurology
Social Sciences

Date 2008 Mar 6

PMID 18320196

Citations 1

Authors

Agustina Falibene

Roxana Josens

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Dynamics of fluid feeding has been deeply studied in insects. However, the ability to vary the nectar-intake rate depending only on the carbohydrate deprivation has been clearly demonstrated only in Camponotus mus ants. When insect morphometry and fluid properties remain constant, changes in intake rate could only be attributed to variations in sucking pump activity. Previous records of the electrical activity generated during feeding in C. mus have revealed two different signal patterns: the regular (RP, frequencies: 2-5 Hz) and the irregular (IP, frequencies: 7-12 Hz). This work studies the mechanism underlying food intake-rate modulation in ants by analysing whether these patterns are involved. Behaviour and electrical activity generated by ants at different starvation levels were analysed during feeding on sucrose solutions. Ants were able to modulate the intake rate for a variety of sucrose concentrations (10, 40 and 60%w/w). The IP only occurred for 60% of solutions and its presence did not affect the intake rate. However, during the RP generated under the starved state, we found frequencies up to 7.5 Hz. RP frequencies positively correlated with the intake-rate for all sucrose concentrations. Hence, intake-rate modulation according to sugar deprivation is mainly achieved by the ant's ability to vary the pumping frequency.

Citing Articles

Knowing the enemy: ant behavior and control in a pediatric hospital of Buenos Aires.

Josens R, Sola F, Marchisio N, Di Renzo M, Giacometti A Springerplus. 2014; 3:229.

PMID: 24855592 PMC: 4024480. DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-229.

References

Medan V, Josens R . Nectar foraging behaviour is affected by ant body size in Camponotus mus. J Insect Physiol. 2005; 51(8):853-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2005.03.016. View

Kingsolver J, Daniel T . On the mechanics and energetics of nectar feeding in butterflies. J Theor Biol. 1979; 76(2):167-79. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(79)90368-0. View

Borrell B . Mechanics of nectar feeding in the orchid bee Euglossa imperialis: pressure, viscosity and flow. J Exp Biol. 2006; 209(Pt 24):4901-7. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02593. View

Roubik D, Buchmann S . Nectar selection by Melipona and Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and the ecology of nectar intake by bee colonies in a tropical forest. Oecologia. 2017; 61(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1007/BF00379082. View

Borrell B . Scaling of nectar foraging in orchid bees. Am Nat. 2007; 169(5):569-80. DOI: 10.1086/512689. View

Wainwright P, Westneat M, Bellwood D . Modulation of prey capture kinematics in the cheeklined wrasse Oxycheilinus digrammus (Teleostei: Labridae). J Exp Zool. 2001; 290(2):88-100. DOI: 10.1002/jez.1038. View

Raizen D, Lee R, Avery L . Interacting genes required for pharyngeal excitation by motor neuron MC in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1995; 141(4):1365-82. PMC: 1206873. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1365. View

Vogel S . Living in a physical world X. Pumping fluids through conduits. J Biosci. 2007; 32(2):207-22. DOI: 10.1007/s12038-007-0021-4. View

Josens , Roces . Foraging in the ant Camponotus mus: nectar-intake rate and crop filling depend on colony starvation. J Insect Physiol. 2000; 46(7):1103-1110. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1910(99)00220-6. View

10.

Thomson A, Holling C . Experimental component analysis of blowfly feeding behaviour. J Insect Physiol. 1974; 20(8):1553-63. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1910(74)90086-9. View

11.

Guarneri A, Diotaiuti L, Gontijo N, Gontijo A, Pereira M . Blood-feeding performance of nymphs and adults of Triatoma brasiliensis on human hosts. Acta Trop. 2003; 87(3):361-70. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-706x(03)00121-9. View

12.

Nemeth . Modulation of buccal pressure during prey capture in Hexagrammos decagrammus (Teleostei: Hexagrammidae). J Exp Biol. 1997; 200(Pt 15):2145-54. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.200.15.2145. View

13.

May P . Nectar uptake rates and optimal nectar concentrations of two butterfly species. Oecologia. 2017; 66(3):381-386. DOI: 10.1007/BF00378303. View

14.

Ribeiro J . Blood-feeding arthropods: live syringes or invertebrate pharmacologists?. Infect Agents Dis. 1995; 4(3):143-52. View

15.

Kingsolver J, Daniel T . Mechanical determinants of nectar feeding strategy in hummingbirds: energetics, tongue morphology, and licking behavior. Oecologia. 2017; 60(2):214-226. DOI: 10.1007/BF00379523. View

16.

SantAnna M, Diotaiuti L, Gontijo A, Gontijo N, Pereira M . Feeding behaviour of morphologically similar Rhodnius species: influence of mechanical characteristics and salivary function. J Insect Physiol. 2003; 47(12):1459-1465. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1910(01)00136-6. View

17.

McGlynn T, Kirksey S . The effects of food presentation and microhabitat upon resource monopoly in a ground-foraging ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) community. Rev Biol Trop. 2001; 48(2-3):629-41. View

18.

Avery L, Horvitz H . Effects of starvation and neuroactive drugs on feeding in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Exp Zool. 1990; 253(3):263-70. DOI: 10.1002/jez.1402530305. View

19.

Davidson D, Cook S, Snelling R . Liquid-feeding performances of ants (Formicidae): ecological and evolutionary implications. Oecologia. 2004; 139(2):255-66. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1508-4. View

20.

Harder L . Effects of nectar concentration and flower depth on flower handling efficiency of bumble bees. Oecologia. 2017; 69(2):309-315. DOI: 10.1007/BF00377639. View