» Articles » PMID: 18318904

Pelvic Radiography in ATLS Algorithms: A Diminishing Role?

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2008 Mar 6
PMID 18318904
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Pelvic x-ray is a routine part of the primary survey of polytraumatized patients according to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines. However, pelvic CT is the gold standard imaging technique in the diagnosis of pelvic fractures. This study was conducted to confirm the safety of a modified ATLS algorithm omitting pelvic x-ray in hemodynamically stable polytraumatized patients with clinically stable pelvis in favour of later pelvic examination by CT scan.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all polytraumatized patients in our emergency room between 01.07.2004 and 31.01.2006. Inclusion criteria were blunt abdominal trauma, initial hemodynamic stability and a stable pelvis on clinical examination. We excluded patients requiring immediate intervention because of hemodynamic instability.

Results: We reviewed the records of n = 452 polytraumatized patients, of which n = 91 fulfilled inclusion criteria (56% male, mean age = 45 years). The mechanism of trauma included 43% road traffic accidents, 47% falls. In 68/91 (75%) patients, both a pelvic x-ray and a CT examination were performed; the remainder had only pelvic CT. In 6/68 (9%) patients, pelvic fracture was diagnosed by pelvic x-ray. None of these 6 patients was found having a false positive pelvic x-ray, i.e. there was no fracture on pelvic CT scan. In 3/68 (4%) cases a fracture was missed in the pelvic x-ray, but confirmed on CT (false negative on x-ray). None of the diagnosed fractures needed an immediate therapeutic intervention. 5 (56%) were classified type A fractures, and another 4 (44%) B 2.1 in computed tomography (AO classification). One A 2.1 fracture was found in a clinically stable patient who only received CT scan (1/23).

Conclusion: While pelvic x-ray is an integral part of ATLS assessment, this retrospective study suggests that in hemodynamically stable patients with clinically stable pevis, its sensitivity is only 67% and it may safely be omitted in favor of a pelvic CT examination if such is planned in adjunct assessment and available. The results support the safety and utility of our modified ATLS algorithm. A randomized controlled trial using the algorithm can safely be conducted to confirm the results.

Citing Articles

Evolution of management strategies for unstable pelvic ring injuries over the past 40 years: a systematic review.

Sawauchi K, Esposito L, Kalbas Y, Alasauskas Z, Neuhaus V, Pape H Patient Saf Surg. 2024; 18(1):38.

PMID: 39731120 PMC: 11673330. DOI: 10.1186/s13037-024-00421-z.


Detection of Sacral Fractures on Radiographs Using Artificial Intelligence.

Inagaki N, Nakata N, Ichimori S, Udaka J, Mandai A, Saito M JB JS Open Access. 2022; 7(3).

PMID: 36128254 PMC: 9478257. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00030.


Developing a decision instrument to guide abdominal-pelvic imaging of blunt trauma patients: Methodology and protocol of the NEXUS abdominal-pelvic imaging study.

Raja A, Rodriguez R, Gupta M, Isaacs E, Kornblith L, Prabhakar A PLoS One. 2022; 17(7):e0271070.

PMID: 35877687 PMC: 9312398. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271070.


Management of Pelvic Ring Injury Patients With Hemodynamic Instability.

Marmor M, El Naga A, Barker J, Matz J, Stergiadou S, Miclau T Front Surg. 2020; 7:588845.

PMID: 33282907 PMC: 7688898. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.588845.


False negative computed tomography scan due to pelvic binder in a patient with pelvic disruption: a case report and review of the literature.

Jamme S, Poletti A, Gamulin A, Rutschmann O, Andereggen E, Grosgurin O J Med Case Rep. 2018; 12(1):271.

PMID: 30236156 PMC: 6149070. DOI: 10.1186/s13256-018-1808-7.


References
1.
Todd Miller M, Pasquale M, Bromberg W, Wasser T, Cox J . Not so FAST. J Trauma. 2003; 54(1):52-9; discussion 59-60. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200301000-00007. View

2.
Rommens P, Wissing H, Serdarevic M . [Significance of computerized tomography in the diagnosis and therapy of fractures of the posterior pelvic ring and hip joint]. Unfallchirurgie. 1987; 13(1):32-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF02585829. View

3.
Muller E, Siebenrock K, Ekkernkamp A, Ganz R, Muhr G . Ipsilateral fractures of the pelvis and the femur--floating hip? A retrospective analysis of 42 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1999; 119(3-4):179-82. DOI: 10.1007/s004020050385. View

4.
Obaid A, Barleben A, Porral D, Lush S, Cinat M . Utility of plain film pelvic radiographs in blunt trauma patients in the emergency department. Am Surg. 2006; 72(10):951-4. DOI: 10.1177/000313480607201025. View

5.
Hammel J, Legome E . Pelvic fracture. J Emerg Med. 2006; 30(1):87-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.09.001. View