» Articles » PMID: 18318773

Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Udenafil, a Novel PDE-5 Inhibitor, in Healthy Young Korean Subjects

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2008 Mar 6
PMID 18318773
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

What Is Already Known About This Subject: The phosphodiesterase (PDE) type 5 inhibitor is a widely used agent that facilitates penile erection. Udenafil is newly developed as a PDE-5 inhibitor.

What This Study Adds: This is the first study to determine the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of udenafil in healthy subjects. Udenafil was safe and well tolerated in healthy Korean subjects. The AUC and C(max) of udenafil increased supraproportionally with increasing dose upon single administration, but there was no significant drug accumulation upon multiple administrations.

Aim: To evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of udenafil, a novel phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor.

Methods: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-rising, parallel-group, single- and multiple-dose study was conducted in healthy Korean subjects. The subjects were allocated to single-dose groups of 25, 50, 100, 200 or 300 mg (eight subjects in each dose group, including two placebos), or to multiple-dose groups of 100 or 200 mg (once-daily dosing for 7 days; nine subjects in each dose group, including three placebos). Serial samples of blood and urine were collected after oral administration and the drug concentrations in plasma and urine were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by monitoring clinical laboratory parameters and adverse events.

Results: Udenafil reached peak plasma concentrations at 0.8-1.3 h, and then declined mono-exponentially with a terminal half-life of 7.3-12.1 h in the single-dose study. The area under the time-concentration curves (AUC) and maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) increased supraproportionally with increasing dose in the single-dose study. During multiple dosing, a steady state was reached at 5 days and little accumulation occurred after repeated dosing for 7 days. Udenafil was generally well tolerated in these healthy subjects, and no serious adverse events occurred.

Conclusions: Udenafil was safe and well tolerated in healthy volunteers. The AUC and C(max) of udenafil increased supraproportionally with increasing dose upon single administration, but there was no significant drug accumulation upon multiple administrations.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Safety and Pharmacokinetics of DDCI-01, a Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor, in Healthy Participants.

Li Q, Huang S, Zhang D, Zhang W, Mao Y, Chen R Clin Pharmacokinet. 2025; .

PMID: 40048121 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-025-01491-7.


An evaluation of drug lag for new drugs approved by the Indian regulator relative to the United States, European Union, and Japanese regulatory agencies: A 15-year analysis (2004-2018).

Konwar M, Maurya M, Nishandar T, Thatte U, Gogtay N Perspect Clin Res. 2021; 12(3):159-164.

PMID: 34386381 PMC: 8323564. DOI: 10.4103/picr.PICR_99_19.


Acute Hemodynamic Changes after Single Administration of Udenafil in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: a Phase IIa Study.

Chang S, Kim H, Chang H, Kim D Korean Circ J. 2019; 49(4):353-360.

PMID: 30808080 PMC: 6428952. DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0281.


Phosphodiesterase type 5 and cancers: progress and challenges.

Barone I, Giordano C, Bonofiglio D, Ando S, Catalano S Oncotarget. 2017; 8(58):99179-99202.

PMID: 29228762 PMC: 5716802. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.21837.


Pulmonary hemodynamics and effects of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition in heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Hwang I, Kim Y, Park J, Yoon Y, Lee S, Kim H BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017; 17(1):150.

PMID: 28606099 PMC: 5468951. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-017-0576-4.


References
1.
Undevia S, Gomez-Abuin G, Ratain M . Pharmacokinetic variability of anticancer agents. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005; 5(6):447-58. DOI: 10.1038/nrc1629. View

2.
Saigal C, Wessells H, Pace J, Schonlau M, Wilt T . Predictors and prevalence of erectile dysfunction in a racially diverse population. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166(2):207-12. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.2.207. View

3.
Fink H, Mac Donald R, Rutks I, Nelson D, Wilt T . Sildenafil for male erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162(12):1349-60. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.162.12.1349. View

4.
Vardi Y, Klein L, Nassar S, Sprecher E, Gruenwald I . Effects of sildenafil citrate (viagra) on blood pressure in normotensive and hypertensive men. Urology. 2002; 59(5):747-52. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01510-8. View

5.
Shim H, Kim Y, Park K, Kim D, Kwon J, Kim W . Pharmacokinetics of DA-8159, a new erectogenic, after intravenous and oral administration to rats: hepatic and intestinal first-pass effects. J Pharm Sci. 2003; 92(11):2185-95. DOI: 10.1002/jps.10482. View