» Articles » PMID: 18312805

Telephone Intervention to Promote Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Among the Urban Poor

Overview
Journal Am J Prev Med
Specialty Public Health
Date 2008 Mar 4
PMID 18312805
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Participation in diabetic retinopathy screening is suboptimal. The Vision is Precious study (2001-2005) tested the hypothesis that a tailored telephone intervention in urban minority diabetes populations, offered in English or Spanish, would result in greater screening for retinopathy than a standard print intervention.

Design: Randomized controlled trial

Setting/participants: Subjects (N=598) were adults with diabetes without a dilated fundus examination (DFE) in >1 year from three healthcare centers in Bronx NY.

Intervention: A tailored telephone intervention to promote retinopathy screening compared to a standard print intervention over a 6-month period.

Main Outcome Measures: Documentation of a DFE within 6 months was the main outcome. Data on risk perceptions using the Risk Perception Survey for Diabetes were collected pre- and post-intervention. Electronic databases were used to obtain hemoglobin A1c information.

Results: Subjects were 40% men, mean age 57 years; 39% reported household incomes as <$15K; 45% reported their race as black, and 42% reported ethnicity as Hispanic/Latino; 23% chose Spanish as their preferred language. Data were analyzed in 2006. There was a 74% increase in retinopathy screening in the telephone versus print group (p<0.0005), with no differences by intervention language or by gender. Predictors of undergoing a DFE included: telephone intervention, baseline risk-perception scores indicating less worry and more realism about diabetes complications, and the interaction of self-reported worry and being in the telephone intervention. Subjects who had poor diabetes control responded with greater success to telephone interventions.

Conclusions: A limited telephone intervention can improve significantly participation in retinopathy screening in a minority, low-income population. This intervention influenced risk perceptions about diabetes complications. Further research is needed to develop effective risk communications to prevent the complications of diabetes.

Citing Articles

Structured Counselling and Regular Telephonic follow up to improve Referral flow and compliance in Nepal for Diabetic Retinopathy(SCREEN-D Study): a randomised controlled trial.

Bhattarai B, Thapa H, Bashyal S, Thapa S, Chaudhuri S, Agiwal V BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):188.

PMID: 38336691 PMC: 10858536. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10647-3.


Prevalence and Visual Consequences of Non-adherent Patients Receiving Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Injections at King Fahad Specialist Hospital (KFSH), Qassim Region.

Alharbi A, Alotayk N, Alaboudi A, Alammar A, Aldekhail M, Alharbi M Cureus. 2023; 15(8):e44340.

PMID: 37779785 PMC: 10538945. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44340.


Mailed Letter Versus Phone Call to Increase Diabetic-Related Retinopathy Screening Engagement by Patients in a Team-Based Primary Care Practice: Prospective, Single-Masked, Randomized Trial.

Stamenova V, Nguyen M, Onabajo N, Merritt R, Sutakovic O, Mossman K J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e37867.

PMID: 36630160 PMC: 9878360. DOI: 10.2196/37867.


Outreach screening to address demographic and economic barriers to diabetic retinopathy care in rural China.

Xiao B, Mercer G, Jin L, Lee H, Chen T, Wang Y PLoS One. 2022; 17(4):e0266380.

PMID: 35442967 PMC: 9020743. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266380.


Interventions to promote access to eyecare for non-dominant ethnic groups in high-income countries: a scoping review.

Hamm L, Yashadhana A, Burn H, Black J, Grey C, Harwood M BMJ Glob Health. 2021; 6(9).

PMID: 34493531 PMC: 8424858. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006188.


References
1.
Nathan D, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, Davis M . The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329(14):977-86. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401. View

2.
Walker E, Zybert P, Basch C . What is the sensitivity and specificity of self-report for retinopathy screening?. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25(5):933-4. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.5.933. View

3.
Hill-Briggs F . Problem solving in diabetes self-management: a model of chronic illness self-management behavior. Ann Behav Med. 2003; 25(3):182-93. DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2503_04. View

4.
. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998; 352(9131):837-53. View

5.
. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2007. Diabetes Care. 2006; 30 Suppl 1:S4-S41. DOI: 10.2337/dc07-S004. View