» Articles » PMID: 18306126

Automated Registration of Intraoperative CT Image Data for Navigated Skull Base Surgery

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2008 Feb 29
PMID 18306126
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: With a new intraoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging system, patient-to-image registration without any invasive registration markers is possible. Furthermore, registration can be performed fully automatically. The accuracy of this method for skull base surgery was investigated in this study.

Methods: We employed a phantom study design. A phantom skull was equipped with 33 target markers in the regions of the anterior and lateral skull base. CT image data were acquired with an intraoperative CT suite. Image data were transferred as DICOM data to the navigation system, and registration was performed automatically. For registration, the position of the patient and the position of the CT gantry were monitored in the imaging process, using the infrared camera of a navigation system. Using the pointing device of the navigation system, the target markers were identified. The accuracy was measured as the spatial difference of the target markers in image space and on the phantom.

Results: Accuracy was always sufficient for image-guided surgery of any region of the skull base, with an average target registration error of below 1.2 mm. In contrast to traditional non-invasive registration methods, there was no difference in registration accuracy between the anterior skull base and the lateral skull base.

Conclusions: Fully automated registration based on a tracked CT gantry is a robust and accurate registration method for skull base surgery.

Citing Articles

Image-to-Patient Registration in Computer-Assisted Surgery of Head and Neck: State-of-the-Art, Perspectives, and Challenges.

Taleb A, Guigou C, Leclerc S, Lalande A, Bozorg Grayeli A J Clin Med. 2023; 12(16).

PMID: 37629441 PMC: 10455300. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165398.


Does the choice of the reference model affect the results of 3D-3D superimposition procedure? A comparison of different protocols for personal identification.

Palamenghi A, De Angelis D, Cellina M, Sforza C, Cattaneo C, Gibelli D Int J Legal Med. 2021; 135(5):1879-1886.

PMID: 33758971 PMC: 8354963. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-021-02550-x.


Navigation accuracy after automatic- and hybrid-surface registration in sinus and skull base surgery.

Grauvogel T, Engelskirchen P, Semper-Hogg W, Grauvogel J, Laszig R PLoS One. 2017; 12(7):e0180975.

PMID: 28700740 PMC: 5507282. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180975.


Minimally invasive surgery of the anterior skull base: transorbital approaches.

Gassner H, Schwan F, Schebesch K GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 14:Doc03.

PMID: 27453759 PMC: 4940979. DOI: 10.3205/cto000118.


Evaluation of 3-dimensional superimposition techniques on various skeletal structures of the head using surface models.

Gkantidis N, Schauseil M, Pazera P, Zorkun B, Katsaros C, Ludwig B PLoS One. 2015; 10(2):e0118810.

PMID: 25706151 PMC: 4338241. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118810.