» Articles » PMID: 18297565

A Follow-up Study of the Occurrence and Consequences of HbA1c Measurements in an Unselected Cohort of Non-pharmacologically Treated Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2008 Feb 26
PMID 18297565
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To describe the occurrence of HbA1c measurements among non-pharmacologically treated diabetes patients, and to evaluate whether poor blood glucose regulation (HbA1c >8%) prompted intensification of treatment.

Method: Data from the National Health Service Registry, the Regional Laboratory Database and the Danish National Hospital Registry were collected from 2002 to 2004 to identify and describe all Type 2 diabetic patients above 40 years of age in a background population of nearly 660,000 citizens in Aarhus County, corresponding to 12% of the total Danish population.

Results: A total of 1989 had at least one HbA1c measurement, whereas 484 (20%) had no HbA1c measurement at all in 2003. Most patients had an HbA1c of less than 8%, and for 820 (41%) HbA1c was less than 6.5%, but for 316 (16%) patients, the first HbA1c measurement in 2003 was above 8%. After 6 months, patients with HbA1c above 8% had a higher probability of initiating pharmacological treatment (M; 0.64; 95% CI 0.58-0.70) (F; 0.68; 95% CI 0.58-0.77) than patients with HbA1c below 8% (M; 0.12; 95% CI 0.10-0.14) (F; 0.11; 95% CI 0.09-0.14).

Conclusion: This study indicates that poor blood glucose regulation (HbA1c >8%) prompted a shift from non-pharmacological treatment to pharmacological treatment for most patients. However, a substantial group of patients are either not monitored on a regular basis or, if monitored, their elevated measurements of HbA1c do not prompt initiation of pharmacological treatment.

Citing Articles

Therapeutic inertia in the treatment of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.

Khunti K, Gomes M, Pocock S, Shestakova M, Pintat S, Fenici P Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017; 20(2):427-437.

PMID: 28834075 PMC: 5813232. DOI: 10.1111/dom.13088.


The effect of screening on the prevalence of diagnosed type 2 diabetes in primary care.

Spigt M, Rikkers A, Doornbos M, Wouters E, Spitz I, van Amelsvoort L Scand J Prim Health Care. 2009; 27(4):232-7.

PMID: 19929181 PMC: 3413915. DOI: 10.3109/02813430903226480.

References
1.
Eliasson B, Cederholm J, Nilsson P, Gudbjornsdottir S . The gap between guidelines and reality: Type 2 diabetes in a National Diabetes Register 1996-2003. Diabet Med. 2005; 22(10):1420-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01648.x. View

2.
Kristensen J, Bro F, Sandbaek A, Lassen J, Lauritzen T . HbAlc in an unselected population of 4438 people with type 2 diabetes in a Danish county. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2002; 19(4):241-6. DOI: 10.1080/02813430152706765. View

3.
. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998; 352(9131):837-53. View

4.
Olesen F, Lauritzen T . Do general practitioners want guidelines? Attitudes toward a county-based and a national college-based approach. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1997; 15(3):141-5. DOI: 10.3109/02813439709018504. View

5.
Poskiparta M, Kasila K, Kiuru P . Dietary and physical activity counselling on type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance by physicians and nurses in primary healthcare in Finland. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2006; 24(4):206-10. DOI: 10.1080/02813430600866463. View