» Articles » PMID: 18296553

Sixty-four-section CT Cerebral Perfusion Evaluation in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis Before and After Stenting with a Cerebral Protection Device

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2008 Feb 26
PMID 18296553
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Brain tissue viability depends on cerebral blood flow (CBF) that has to be kept within a narrow range to avoid the risk of developing ischemia. The aim of the study was to evaluate by 64-section CT (VCT) the cerebral perfusion modifications in patients with severe carotid stenosis before and after undergoing carotid artery stent placement (CAS) with a cerebral protection system.

Materials And Methods: Fifteen patients with unilateral internal carotid stenosis (>or=70%) underwent brain perfusional VCT (PVCT) 5 days before and 1 week after the stent-placement procedure. CBF and mean transit time (MTT) values were measured.

Results: Decreased CBF and increased MTT values were observed in the cerebral areas supplied by the stenotic artery as compared with the areas supplied by the contralateral patent artery (P < .001). A significant normalization of the perfusion parameters was observed after the stent-placement procedure (mean pretreatment MTT value, 5.3 +/- 0.2; mean posttreatment MTT value, 4.3 +/- 0.18, P < .001; mean pretreatment CBF value, 41.2 mL/s +/- 2.1; mean posttreatment CBF value, 47.9 mL/s +/- 2.9, P < .001).

Conclusions: PVCT is a useful technique for the assessment of the hemodynamic modifications in patients with severe carotid stenosis. The quantitative evaluation of cerebral perfusion makes it a reliable tool for the follow-up of patients who undergo CAS.

Citing Articles

Multiple blood flow measurements before and after carotid artery stenting via phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: An observational study.

Tanaka H, Watanabe Y, Nakamura H, Takahashi H, Arisawa A, Fujiwara T PLoS One. 2018; 13(4):e0195099.

PMID: 29641548 PMC: 5895018. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195099.


Carotid Artery Stenting and Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability in Subjects with Chronic Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Szarmach A, Halena G, Kaszubowski M, Piskunowicz M, Studniarek M, Lass P Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18(5).

PMID: 28481312 PMC: 5454921. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18051008.


Role of Extracranial Carotid Duplex and Computed Tomography Perfusion Scanning in Evaluating Perfusion Status of Pericarotid Stenting.

Lin C, Chang Y, Liu C, Yu C, Lu H Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016:7051856.

PMID: 27051669 PMC: 4802025. DOI: 10.1155/2016/7051856.


Haemodynamic alterations in cerebral blood vessels after carotid artery revascularisation: quantitative analysis using 2D phase-contrast MRI.

Youn S, Kim H, Do Y, Do J, Kwon O, Lee N Eur Radiol. 2013; 23(10):2880-90.

PMID: 23732686 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2899-6.


Near-infrared transillumination back scattering sounding--new method to assess brain microcirculation in patients with chronic carotid artery stenosis.

Frydrychowski A, Winklewski P, Szarmach A, Halena G, Bandurski T PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e61936.

PMID: 23613977 PMC: 3629110. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061936.


References
1.
Cenic A, Nabavi D, Craen R, Gelb A, Lee T . Dynamic CT measurement of cerebral blood flow: a validation study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999; 20(1):63-73. View

2.
Grunwald I, Supprian T, Politi M, Struffert T, Falkai P, Krick C . Cognitive changes after carotid artery stenting. Neuroradiology. 2006; 48(5):319-23. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-006-0064-5. View

3.
Barker-Collo S, Feigin V . The impact of neuropsychological deficits on functional stroke outcomes. Neuropsychol Rev. 2006; 16(2):53-64. DOI: 10.1007/s11065-006-9007-5. View

4.
Gates P, Chambers B, Yan B, Chong W, Denton M . Symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis: just when we thought we had all the answers. Intern Med J. 2006; 36(7):445-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01085.x. View

5.
Gray W, Hopkins L, Yadav S, Davis T, Wholey M, Atkinson R . Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg. 2006; 44(2):258-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.044. View