» Articles » PMID: 18294779

Atypical and Malignant Meningioma: Outcome and Prognostic Factors in 119 Irradiated Patients. A Multicenter, Retrospective Study of the Rare Cancer Network

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2008 Feb 26
PMID 18294779
Citations 68
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To retrospectively analyze and assess the outcomes and prognostic factors in a large number of patients with atypical and malignant meningiomas.

Methods And Materials: Ten academic medical centers participating in this Rare Cancer Network contributed 119 cases of patients with atypical or malignant meningiomas treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) after surgery or for recurrence. Eligibility criteria were histologically proven atypical or anaplastic (malignant) meningioma (World Health Organization Grade 2 and 3) treated with fractionated EBRT after initial resection or for recurrence, and age >18 years. Sex ratio (male/female) was 1.3, and mean (+/-SD) age was 57.6 +/- 12 years. Surgery was macroscopically complete (Simpson Grades 1-3) in 71% of patients; histology was atypical and malignant in 69% and 31%, respectively. Mean dose of EBRT was 54.6 +/- 5.1 Gy (range, 40-66 Gy). Median follow-up was 4.1 years.

Results: The 5- and 10-year actuarial overall survival rates were 65% and 51%, respectively, and were significantly influenced by age >60 years (p = 0.005), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (p = 0.01), and high mitotic rate (p = 0.047) on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis age >60 years (p = 0.001) and high mitotic rate (p = 0.02) remained significant adverse prognostic factors. The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 58% and 48%, respectively, and were significantly influenced by KPS (p = 0.04) and high mitotic rate (p = 0.003) on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis only high mitotic rate (p = 0.003) remained a significant prognostic factor.

Conclusions: In this multicenter retrospective study, age, KPS, and mitotic rate influenced outcome. Multicenter prospective studies are necessary to clarify the management and prognostic factors of such a rare disease.

Citing Articles

Establishment and transcriptomic characteristics of radio-resistant meningioma cell lines.

Yu J, Ren L, Wu T, Hua L, Wang D, Wang Y J Neurooncol. 2025; .

PMID: 40019713 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-025-04966-6.


Health-related quality-of-life outcomes in CNS WHO grade 2 and 3 meningioma: a systematic review.

Cook W, Khalil F, Gillespie C, Helmy A Neurosurg Rev. 2025; 48(1):268.

PMID: 40011234 PMC: 11865157. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-025-03420-5.


Malignant Transformation of Meningiomas.

Yu J, Deng J, Ren L, Hua L, Gong Y J Cancer. 2025; 16(5):1684-1693.

PMID: 39991581 PMC: 11843249. DOI: 10.7150/jca.105024.


Sellar and perisellar meningiomas: effects on pituitary function in a Spanish cohort observational study.

Guerrero-Perez F, Biagetti B, Paja-Fano M, Menendez-Torre E, Rivero G, Dios E Pituitary. 2024; 28(1):12.

PMID: 39733084 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-024-01484-y.


Optimal treatment regimen for very elderly patients with atypical meningioma: an analysis of survival outcomes using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

Tang L, Chakravarti S, Li E, Mao Y, Ahmed A, Mukherjee D J Neurooncol. 2024; 171(3):715-724.

PMID: 39560694 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04886-x.