Evolutionary Cytogenetics in Salamanders

Overview

Journal Chromosome Res

Date 2008 Feb 23

PMID 18293112

Citations 30

Authors

Stanley K Sessions

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Salamanders (Amphibia: Caudata/Urodela) have been the subject of numerous cytogenetic studies, and data on karyotypes and genome sizes are available for most groups. Salamanders show a more-or-less distinct dichotomy between families with large chromosome numbers and interspecific variation in chromosome number, relative size, and shape (i.e. position of the centromere), and those that exhibit very little variation in these karyological features. This dichotomy is the basis of a major model of karyotype evolution in salamanders involving a kind of 'karyotypic orthoselection'. Salamanders are also characterized by extremely large genomes (in terms of absolute mass of nuclear DNA) and extensive variation in genome size (and overall size of the chromosomes), which transcends variation in chromosome number and shape. The biological significance and evolution of chromosome number and shape within the karyotype is not yet understood, but genome size variation has been found to have strong phenotypic, biogeographic, and phylogenetic correlates that reveal information about the biological significance of this cytogenetic variable. Urodeles also present the advantage of only 10 families and less than 600 species, which facilitates the analysis of patterns within the entire order. The purpose of this review is to present a summary of what is currently known about overall patterns of variation in karyology and genome size in salamanders. These patterns are discussed within an evolutionary context.

Citing Articles

Amphibian Segmentation Clock Models Suggest How Large Genome and Cell Sizes Slow Developmental Rate.

Taylor A, Prasad A, Mueller R Integr Org Biol. 2024; 6(1):obae021.

PMID: 39006893 PMC: 11245677. DOI: 10.1093/iob/obae021.

Robertsonian Translocation between Human Chromosomes 21 and 22, Inherited across Three Generations, without Any Phenotypic Effect.

Federico C, Brancato D, Bruno F, Galvano D, Caruso M, Saccone S Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(6).

PMID: 38927657 PMC: 11202415. DOI: 10.3390/genes15060722.

Determinants of genetic diversity in Neotropical salamanders (Plethodontidae: Bolitoglossini).

Segovia-Ramirez M, Ramirez-Sanchez O, Decena Segarra L, Rios-Carlos H, Rovito S Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(11):e10707.

PMID: 38020701 PMC: 10654480. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10707.

Karyotypes of water frogs from the Pelophylax esculentus complex: results of cross-species chromosomal painting.

Dedukh D, Maslova A, Al-Rikabi A, Padutsch N, Liehr T, Krasikova A Chromosoma. 2023; 132(4):329-342.

PMID: 38001396 DOI: 10.1007/s00412-023-00812-8.

Metamorphosis Imposes Variable Constraints on Genome Expansion through Effects on Development.

Mueller R, Cressler C, Schwartz R, Chong R, Butler M Integr Org Biol. 2023; 5(1):obad015.

PMID: 37143961 PMC: 10153748. DOI: 10.1093/iob/obad015.

References

MACGREGOR H, Sessions S . The biological significance of variation in satellite DNA and heterochromatin in newts of the genus Triturus: an evolutionary perspective. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1986; 312(1154):243-59. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1986.0005. View

Bi K, Bogart J . Identification of intergenomic recombinations in unisexual salamanders of the genus Ambystoma by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006; 112(3-4):307-12. DOI: 10.1159/000089885. View

Sessions S, Stock M, Vieites D, Quarles R, Min M, Wake D . Cytogenetic analysis of the Asian plethodontid salamander, Karsenia koreana: evidence for karyotypic conservation, chromosome repatterning, and genome size evolution. Chromosome Res. 2008; 16(4):563-74. DOI: 10.1007/s10577-008-1197-7. View

MACGREGOR H, UZZELL Jr T . GYNOGENESIS IN SALAMANDERS RELATED TO AMBYSTOMA JEFFERSONIANUM. Science. 1964; 143(3610):1043-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.143.3610.1043. View

Sessions S, MACGREGOR H, Schmid M, Haaf T . Cytology, embryology, and evolution of the developmental arrest syndrome in newts of the genus Triturus (Caudata: Salamandridae). J Exp Zool. 1988; 248(3):321-34. DOI: 10.1002/jez.1402480311. View

Morescalchi A, Olmo E . Sirenids: a family of polyploid urodeles?. Experientia. 1974; 30(5):491-2. DOI: 10.1007/BF01926310. View

Spolsky C, Phillips C, Uzzell T . GYNOGENETIC REPRODUCTION IN HYBRID MOLE SALAMANDERS (GENUS AMBYSTOMA). Evolution. 2017; 46(6):1935-1944. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb01179.x. View

Muller H . THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE. Mutat Res. 1964; 106:2-9. DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(64)90047-8. View

Mizuno S, MACGREGOR H . Chromosomes, DNA sequences, and evolution in salamanders of the genus Plethodon. Chromosoma. 1974; 48(3):239-96. DOI: 10.1007/BF00326507. View

10.

Sessions S, Larson A . DEVELOPMENTAL CORRELATES OF GENOME SIZE IN PLETHODONTID SALAMANDERS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR GENOME EVOLUTION. Evolution. 2017; 41(6):1239-1251. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb02463.x. View

11.

Bogart J, Licht L . Reproduction and the origin of polyploids in hybrid salamanders of the genus Ambystoma. Can J Genet Cytol. 1986; 28(4):605-17. DOI: 10.1139/g86-089. View

12.

Vinogradov A . Intron-genome size relationship on a large evolutionary scale. J Mol Evol. 1999; 49(3):376-84. DOI: 10.1007/pl00006561. View

13.

Murakami T, Maki N, Nishida-Umehara C, Matsuda Y, Agata K . Establishment of high-resolution FISH mapping system and its application for molecular cytogenetic characterization of chromosomes in newt, Cynops pyrrhogaster (Urodela, Amphibia). Chromosome Res. 2007; 15(4):471-84. DOI: 10.1007/s10577-007-1139-9. View

14.

Mizuno S, Andrews C, MACGREGOR H . Interspecific "common" repetitive DNA sequences in salamanders of the genus Plethodon. Chromosoma. 1976; 58(1):1-31. DOI: 10.1007/BF00293437. View

15.

Zhang P, Chen Y, Zhou H, Liu Y, Wang X, Papenfuss T . Phylogeny, evolution, and biogeography of Asiatic Salamanders (Hynobiidae). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(19):7360-5. PMC: 1464346. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0602325103. View

16.

Voss S, Smith J, Gardiner D, Parichy D . Conserved vertebrate chromosome segments in the large salamander genome. Genetics. 2001; 158(2):735-46. PMC: 1403154. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/158.2.735. View

17.

Orgel L, Crick F . Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature. 1980; 284(5757):604-7. DOI: 10.1038/284604a0. View

18.

Hardie D, Gregory T, Hebert P . From pixels to picograms: a beginners' guide to genome quantification by Feulgen image analysis densitometry. J Histochem Cytochem. 2002; 50(6):735-49. DOI: 10.1177/002215540205000601. View

19.

Litvinchuk S, Rosanov J, Borkin L . Correlations of geographic distribution and temperature of embryonic development with the nuclear DNA content in the Salamandridae (Urodela, Amphibia). Genome. 2007; 50(4):333-42. DOI: 10.1139/g07-010. View

20.

Roth G, BLANKE J, Wake D . Cell size predicts morphological complexity in the brains of frogs and salamanders. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994; 91(11):4796-800. PMC: 43875. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.4796. View