» Articles » PMID: 18293054

The Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Classification of Groin Hernias According to the Criteria of the Unified Classification System

Overview
Journal Hernia
Publisher Springer
Date 2008 Feb 23
PMID 18293054
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The modern concept of type-related individualized groin hernia surgery imposes a demand for precise and accurate preoperative determination of the type of groin hernia. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography in classification of groin hernias, according to the criteria of the unified classification system. Unified classification divides groin hernias into nine types (grades): type I (indirect, small), II (indirect, medium), III (indirect, large), IV (direct, small), V (direct, medium), VI (direct, large), VII (combined-pantaloon), VIII (femoral), and O (other).

Patients And Methods: One hundred and twenty-five adult patients with clinically diagnosed or suspected groin hernias were examined. Ultrasonography of both groins was performed with a 5 to 10-MHz linear-array transducer. Preoperative ultrasonographic findings of type of groin hernia were compared with the intraoperative findings, which were considered the gold standard.

Results: Total accuracy of ultrasonography in determination of type of groin hernia was 96% (119 of 124 correct predictions of type of groin hernia compared with surgical explorations). All hernias of types I, IV, V, VII, and VIII were correctly identified with ultrasonography (sensitivity and specificity 100%). In the remaining five cases of the 124 (4%), hernia was incorrectly classified with ultrasonography: type VI (direct, large) was misdiagnosed as type III (indirect, large) in three cases, type III as type VI in one case, and type III as type II (indirect, medium) in one case. The sensitivity and the specificity of ultrasonography in classifying type II were 100 and 99%, respectively, for type III, 85 and 97%, and for type VI, 90 and 99%.

Conclusion: Ultrasonography of the groin regions could be used with great accuracy for precise classification of groin hernias in adults. Each type of groin hernia, according to the unified classification system that we used for classification, has a characteristic ultrasonographic presentation, which is demonstrated in this study.

Citing Articles

Tailored treatment of female indirect inguinal hernias by using single-port laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suture: a comparison between children and adults.

Wang S, Lee C, Hsieh W, Yen J, Tseng I, Wong C Hernia. 2024; 28(4):1365-1372.

PMID: 38775981 PMC: 11297084. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03055-3.


High-resolution ultrasound of spigelian and groin hernias: a closer look at fascial architecture and aponeurotic passageways.

Picasso R, Pistoia F, Zaottini F, Airaldi S, Perez M, Pansecchi M J Ultrason. 2021; 21(84):53-62.

PMID: 33791116 PMC: 8008201. DOI: 10.15557/JoU.2021.0008.


The application of single-port laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suture for the management of indirect inguinal hernia in female adults.

Wang S, Yen J, Hsu S Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):16244.

PMID: 33004858 PMC: 7529805. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73171-4.


Lipoma of the fossa femoralis mimicking a femoral hernia. Report of 2 cases.

Amato G, Romano G, Agrusa A, Rodolico V, Gordini L, Calo P Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018; 49:223-227.

PMID: 30032015 PMC: 6076352. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.07.009.


Ultrasonography in diagnosing clinically occult groin hernia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kwee R, Kwee T Eur Radiol. 2018; 28(11):4550-4560.

PMID: 29761361 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5489-9.


References
1.
Kraft B, Kolb H, Kuckuk B, Haaga S, Leibl B, Kraft K . Diagnosis and classification of inguinal hernias. Surg Endosc. 2003; 17(12):2021-4. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-9283-y. View

2.
van den Berg J, De Valois J, Go P, ROSENBUSCH G . Detection of groin hernia with physical examination, ultrasound, and MRI compared with laparoscopic findings. Invest Radiol. 1999; 34(12):739-43. DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199912000-00002. View

3.
Robinson P, Hensor E, Lansdown M, Ambrose N, Chapman A . Inguinofemoral hernia: accuracy of sonography in patients with indeterminate clinical features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187(5):1168-78. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1251. View

4.
Aguirre D, Santosa A, Casola G, Sirlin C . Abdominal wall hernias: imaging features, complications, and diagnostic pitfalls at multi-detector row CT. Radiographics. 2005; 25(6):1501-20. DOI: 10.1148/rg.256055018. View

5.
Dattola P, Alberti A, Dattola A, Giannetto G, Basile G, Basile M . Inguino-crural hernias: preoperative diagnosis and post-operative follow-up by high-resolution ultrasonography. A personal experience. Ann Ital Chir. 2002; 73(1):65-8. View