» Articles » PMID: 18289372

Safety and Immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted Subunit Influenza Vaccine in Elderly Chinese Subjects

Overview
Journal Immun Ageing
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2008 Feb 22
PMID 18289372
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted subunit influenza vaccine (Sub/MF59; FLUAD, Novartis Vaccines) was evaluated among elderly Chinese subjects (> or = 60 years of age). After a preliminary Phase I, open-label study (n = 25) to assess safety 1-14 days post-vaccination, a comparative observer-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial (n = 600) was performed to assess safety and immunogenicity versus a non-adjuvanted subunit influenza vaccine (Subunit; Agrippal, Novartis Vaccines). Subjects were randomised (2:1) to receive Sub/MF59 or Subunit.

Results: Both vaccines were well tolerated, with no vaccine-related serious adverse events reported during the Phase I trial. During the observer-blind study, local and systemic reactions were generally similar for both vaccines 1-22 days post-vaccination; however, injection-site induration was more frequent among the Subunit group (P < 0.05), and mild pain at the injection site and fever were more frequent among Sub/MF59 recipients (P < or = 0.005). Both vaccines induced a significant (P < 0.001) increase in geometric mean titres (GMTs) for the three strains tested, versus baseline; GMTs against A/H1N1, A/H3N2 and B were significantly higher in the Sub/MF59 group (P = 0.034, P < 0.001 and P = 0.005, respectively). GMT ratios against A/H1N1, A/H3N2 and B were also significantly higher in the Sub/MF59 group (P = 0.038, P < 0.001 and P = 0.006, respectively). Similarly, the percentage of subjects achieving seroprotection or seroconversion on Day 22 was greater for Sub/MF59 recipients, reaching significance for A/H3N2 (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: MF59-adjuvanted subunit influenza vaccine is well tolerated by elderly Chinese subjects and induces a higher level of immunogenicity than a non-adjuvanted subunit influenza vaccine in this population that is at high risk of influenza-related complications.

Clinical Trial Registry: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00310648.

Citing Articles

Relative Efficacy, Effectiveness and Safety of Newer and/or Enhanced Seasonal Influenza Vaccines for the Prevention of Laboratory-Confirmed Influenza in Individuals Aged 18 years and Over: Update of a Systematic Review.

Askar M, Ali K, Batke M, Brugger T, Falman A, Robertson A Rev Med Virol. 2025; 35(2):e70020.

PMID: 39994168 PMC: 11850296. DOI: 10.1002/rmv.70020.


[Health Technology Assessment: a value-based tool for the evaluation of healthcare technologies. Reassessment of the cell-culture-derived quadrivalent influenza vaccine: Flucelvax Tetra 2.0].

Calabro G, Boccalini S, Bechini A, Panatto D, Domnich A, Lai P J Prev Med Hyg. 2023; 63(4 Suppl 1):E1-E140.

PMID: 37034835 PMC: 10079375. DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.4s1.


Recommendations on the use of MF59-Adjuvanted Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (Fluad): Supplemental Statement of Seasonal Influenza Vaccine for 2011-2012 An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS) National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI).

Can Commun Dis Rep. 2019; 37(ACS-6):1-68.

PMID: 31701945 PMC: 6802457. DOI: 10.14745/ccdr.v37i00a06.


Enhanced Passive Safety Surveillance (EPSS) confirms an optimal safety profile of the use of MF59 -adjuvanted influenza vaccine in older adults: Results from three consecutive seasons.

Panatto D, Haag M, Lai P, Tomczyk S, Amicizia D, Lino M Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2019; 14(1):61-66.

PMID: 31617965 PMC: 6928029. DOI: 10.1111/irv.12685.


Comparative Immunogenicity of Enhanced Seasonal Influenza Vaccines in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Ng T, Cowling B, Gao H, Thompson M J Infect Dis. 2018; 219(10):1525-1535.

PMID: 30551178 PMC: 6775043. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiy720.


References
1.
Iob A, Brianti G, Zamparo E, Gallo T . Evidence of increased clinical protection of an MF59-adjuvant influenza vaccine compared to a non-adjuvant vaccine among elderly residents of long-term care facilities in Italy. Epidemiol Infect. 2005; 133(4):687-93. PMC: 2870297. DOI: 10.1017/s0950268805003936. View

2.
Del Giudice G, Hilbert A, Bugarini R, Minutello A, Popova O, Toneatto D . An MF59-adjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccine containing A/Panama/1999 (H3N2) induced broader serological protection against heterovariant influenza virus strain A/Fujian/2002 than a subunit and a split influenza vaccine. Vaccine. 2006; 24(16):3063-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.01.015. View

3.
Hsieh Y, Chen H, Yen J, Liu D, Chang L, Lu C . Influenza in Taiwan: seasonality and vaccine strain match. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2005; 38(4):238-43. View

4.
Wong C, Chan K, Hedley A, Peiris J . Influenza-associated mortality in Hong Kong. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 39(11):1611-7. DOI: 10.1086/425315. View

5.
OHagan D . MF59 is a safe and potent vaccine adjuvant that enhances protection against influenza virus infection. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2007; 6(5):699-710. DOI: 10.1586/14760584.6.5.699. View