» Articles » PMID: 1828799

Development of In-vitro Resistance to Glycopeptide Antibiotics: Assessment in Staphylococci of Different Species

Overview
Date 1991 Jan 1
PMID 1828799
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Forty-two clinical isolates belonging to ten species of staphylococci were studied for their ability to develop single-step resistance, in vitro, to glycopeptide antibiotics. Selection was attempted through separate exposure to four glycopeptides (vancomycin, teicoplanin, and two investigational semisynthetic derivatives of the latter, TD-A3 and CTA-A1) on agar containing 10 mg/l of the test drug. No survivors from any test strain were recovered after exposure to TD-A3 or CTA-A1. After exposure to vancomycin or teicoplanin, surviving clones were only recovered from strains of three species, Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, and S. haemolyticus. Emergence of resistant clones was easier to observe from strains of S. haemolyticus exposed to teicoplanin. When tested for susceptibility, many survivors exhibited vancomycin and teicoplanin MICs below the drug concentration used for in-vitro selection, probably due to an inoculum effect in the plating procedure. In particular, the vancomycin MICs did not exceed 8 mg/l for S. aureus and S. epidermidis clones, and reached 16 mg/l for some clones from a S. haemolyticus strain. Teicoplanin MICs did not exceed 8 mg/l for S. aureus clones, but reached 64 mg/l for some clones of S. epidermidis, and were particularly high (64 to greater than or equal to 128 mg/l) for most clones of S. haemolyticus. In contrast, against all clones selected from all three species, the MICs of TD-A3 and CTA-A1 did not exceed 2 and 4 mg/l, respectively. Morphological investigations indicated that the colonies of a highly resistant S. haemolyticus clone were smaller and more butyraceous in consistency than those of the parent strain. In transmission and scanning electron microscopy studies, this same S. haemolyticus clone showed a more irregular cell wall than the parent strain.

Citing Articles

Potent, specific MEPicides for treatment of zoonotic staphylococci.

Edwards R, Heueck I, Lee S, Shah I, Miller J, Jezewski A PLoS Pathog. 2020; 16(6):e1007806.

PMID: 32497104 PMC: 7297381. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007806.


Inhibitory and resistance-modifying potential of plant-based alkaloids against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Mohtar M, Johari S, Li A, Isa M, Mustafa S, Ali A Curr Microbiol. 2009; 59(2):181-6.

PMID: 19475447 DOI: 10.1007/s00284-009-9416-9.


In vitro evaluation of antibiotics' combinations for empirical therapy of suspected methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus severe respiratory infections.

Drago L, De Vecchi E, Nicola L, Gismondo M BMC Infect Dis. 2007; 7:111.

PMID: 17888153 PMC: 2025599. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-7-111.


Interactions between glycopeptides and beta-lactams against isogenic pairs of teicoplanin-susceptible and -resistant strains of Staphylococcus haemolyticus.

Vignaroli C, Biavasco F, Varaldo P Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006; 50(7):2577-82.

PMID: 16801450 PMC: 1489795. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00260-06.


Relationship between glycopeptide use and decreased susceptibility to teicoplanin in isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Bertin M, Muller A, Bertrand X, Cornette C, Thouverez M, Talon D Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004; 23(5):375-9.

PMID: 15112071 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-004-1129-1.